Interview – Miles Skarin: Creating ‘The Overview’ film with Steven Wilson (revised post)

A still from The Overview film directed by Miles Skarin

Miles Skarin makes music videos for Steven Wilson and his band Porcupine Tree. He also designs websites such as Stevenwilsonhq with his brother, Rob Skarin. Miles has recently made a full-length animated film to accompany Wilson’s latest solo album, The Overview. The film has been shown during the tour to support the new album, and the track Objects: Meanwhile from the first song on the new album Objects Outlive Us has been released as an official video.

Nick Holmes Music has been given an exclusive insight into the making of the new film with Miles Skarin [MS].

MS: We go back about ten years or so. We originally started out as massive Porcupine Tree fans. We made the fan site starsdie.com. Being big fans of Porcupine Tree, Steven Wilson, and the other progressive rock bands at the time, we made a couple of fan sites. We really wanted to know everything about Steven and Porcupine Tree, and where the music was coming from because we just loved it so much. A lot of these bands hadn’t really taken off on social media at the time.

Miles Skarin
Miles Skarin

My brother wrote a load of the news articles for the website. I did a lot of the design work. And then one day we had an e-mail that dropped into the inbox. That was Steven saying, “Hey, you guys are doing this really well, do you want to come on board and help us out?” Which was incredible as fans, to have that message just land in your inbox, it was a fantastic day. And so we just jumped at the chance. We redesigned Steven’s website and tried to boost his presence on social media, and we’ve been helping with that ever since.

MS:  I think that was what he said. I think it was just because we were putting way more content onto our website. One of the things that we were thinking about was that every now and again you’d have an album release. And then after the album cycle there would be nothing posted online. Maybe a year, two years later, thereโ€™d be another album and maybe there’d be some press.

Steven always did incredible box sets. There was always a massive wealth of artwork and stuff to complement the music. So it was just a way of keeping fans engaged with Steven, even outside of the album cycles. And also while on tour as well, making sure to post photos and updates from live shows and just build that online community.

We had a forum at one point which we really enjoyed doing because it was bringing fans together and talking about the music that we loved. Through that process we met a few more people in the progressive rock space, record labels like Inside Out Music, Sony and Kscope; Steven was on working with those guys through Blackfield and his own releases at the time.

MS: Oh wow. It’s just the peak, isn’t it? As a filmmaker, it doesn’t get better than that, surely. It was such an incredible experience, to see your work on a screen that’s the size of a building is something that I didn’t think I’d ever experience. As I was delivering the DCP file you take to give to the cinema to put it on the screen, the projectionist, Michael, took me up into the projection room at the back of the IMAX. And that’s cinema history, because you’ve got all of Christopher Nolan films; these huge spools of film, and they’re just labelled with handwritten notes saying โ€˜Tenetโ€™, โ€˜Inceptionโ€™ and โ€˜Interstellar.โ€™ it was just an absolutely wonderful experience to know that my film was going to be on the same screen.

I feel so fortunate and lucky to have to have been able to do it and it’s all thanks to Steven, for creating the music and placing his trust in me to do a film, hopefully that does some sort of justice to the incredible music that he produces.

MS: I think he always saw it as a piece that was two halves, side one and side two. When we were talking about visuals for it, one of the things that we were talking about was if you’ve got two 20-minute-long songs there isn’t really a concept of singles. So the idea of doing a promotional single didn’t really apply. Of course we went with the Objects Outlive Us section Objects: Meanwhile as a single.


Steven Wilson – Objects Outlive Us: Objects: Meanwhile

From the start, Steven wanted there to be visual material, a film to go across the entire audio, which is such an incredible challenge to have to try and think about, because especially in my style, which is animation that’s a big undertaking. It was always from the start, โ€œlet’s make a film, let’s make a movie for this.โ€

MS: I’ve always loved space. I’ve always been aware of space, been aware of missions into space and where we are in space, and galaxies and solar systems. So I think there’s a lot of knowledge I had already accumulated about space. I really wanted to build that kind of idea of scale into the film as well, because that was what we were trying to produce from the start, the idea of perspective.

And so I was looking up scales in numbers of how large planets are on Wikipedia. You can search any star or planet and it will tell you in astronomical units how large that planet or star is. And the numbers get big very quickly. I tried putting all those numbers into my computer software thinking, โ€œthis will be great. I’ll just put all the numbers in and then I can just pull the camera out and that would show me the scale.โ€ But it starts to glitch physically on the screen. It can’t work out the coordinates for the polygons and the shapes you’re making to exist in a space that large because the computers can’t handle the sheer size of it.

So I was trying to find out as much as I could about space, and trying to keep it very scientific in a way. But as soon as I realised it was going to need a certain level of artistic direction, because the software couldn’t handle it, I had to kind of deviate. But I did definitely try to keep as much of the scientific information there, and I was also looking into different phenomena and objects in space; one of them is called a magnetar, which is these incredibly dense stars which have a very strong magnetic field. And it’s fascinating reading about these objects in space that just don’t seem real. And yet they are out there somewhere. It was very enjoyable doing that.

Sunrise seen from space. Illustration inspired by the opening scene of Stanley Kubrick's film 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Sunrise seen from space. Illustration inspired by the opening scene of Stanley Kubrick’s film 2001: A Space Odyssey. Image by Michael Melchinger. Source Wikimedia Commons

MS: Those films are incredible. I would say those films would be my main inspiration and reference points for The Overview. I remember watching Interstellar in the cinema and being absolutely blown away by it, not just visually from how it depicts space, but also the performance of the actors as well, and the emotion, and the effect that time dilation would have on people experiencing it. They did that very, very well.

I guess our challenge was to try and create a new visual language. But the person I have to thank for most of that is Hajo [Mรผller] who had already created all this incredible artwork. It’s so stark and beautiful in the way that he’s used real imagery and texture to create the pieces. I love the large format images that Hajo produced to really give you that sense of a wide screen or cinematic format. He sent through a load of the artwork quite early in the process. His artwork by the time that I was really working with it was already mostly there and just incredible images. I was looking at that and thinking he’s done it, he’s created the visual language of The Overview and if I can even get a small piece of that into my film then I’ll be happy because I love his work.

MS: I think the main piece that really shows the scale would be Perspective, the first section of the second half. We’ve got Rotem [Wilson]’s voice, speaking through these incredible numbers such as ten to the power of twelve. But what does that mean? And so one of the things we were talking about was by putting up that number onto the screen, do people know that that’s going to be? The number of zeros that are at the end of these numbers, your brain can’t process it that well. And so when we were thinking of showing the scales, I had to split up those sequences and of course it has to be stylized to the music as well.

But there’s one moment where you can see the sun and you can see the different rings of the orbits of our planets in our solar system. And the camera bounces back and bounces forward quite fast. One of the things that I’m not sure if people quite catch is that our Sun just shrinks by a huge amount and then these absolutely colossal stars that are the next scale up swirl into the frame. So even on a 4K screen, placing these objects next to each other, our Sun suddenly becomes minuscule against these larger stars out there. So it’s actually very difficult to have a reference point when you’re looking at these sorts of visuals in a way that really puts it in perspective for us humans to understand.

‘The combination of analogue electronics and my wife Rotemโ€™s narration, accompanied by Miles Skarin’s brilliant visuals depicting the sheer enormity of our known universe and the idea of cosmic vertigo, is proving to be an incredible high point of the current live show.’ Steven Wilson on The Overview: Perspective (1 July 2025)

The other part of the film that talks about scale is the section called Cosmic Suns of Toil which is midway through the first half. For that we’ve got the camera that just pulls back and goes through all the different layers of space. I wanted to frame our solar system and then what’s outside of our solar system. This is where I was doing my research on what these layers are, if I set a course for the stars and kept going, what objects would I move through. As you get outside of our solar system, there’s The Local Bubble, and The Local Cluster.

It’s amazing to consider that there’s so many other stars and solar systems out there, and then it just keeps going and keeps going until we can’t see any further because light can’t travel. There’s a certain amount of light that it can travel compared to how fast the speed of light is and that’s elapsed. Then eventually at the end of that section, Cosmic Suns of Toil, we reach the edge of the Cosmic Web, which is these, almost like strand filaments of the matter of galaxies.

And then what’s on the outside? We don’t know. So we have a slightly more abstract, stylized section and then we just dive straight down. The thing that I find amazing about that is it’s set up to be relative scale, not absolute scale. So when the camera flies straight back through the Local Cluster of our solar system and then back onto Earth, all of that’s over in about like three or four frames of video. Itโ€™s incredible that we cross so much distance in the space of a millisecond.

The Alien on the moor

MS: I feel like it’s a great way to introduce where we are right now as a species. I think the key takeaway from the film is that we look inwards so much, and when you look outwards at space there’s so much out there which is unattainable and unreachable for a lot of humans, so maybe we don’t give much thought to the perspective of what we are and what our reality is. I don’t know how many people in the modern age are looking up at space and thinking, “I know what’s up there and I know what that means about where I am.”



Every time I go outside and walk down to the end of my road at night, and I’ve got stars above me, I’m always looking up and thinking, โ€œthat’s all right there.โ€ I feel like that’s a great moment to start the record and say we’re not looking at humans this time around. We know we’re looking out at space, but then we are looking back at what that means for the human race.

A teenager with his first telescope

And there with his first telescope
A teenager stands full of hormones and hope
As he squints at the night, like a painting of light
He doesn’t suppose that a black hole implodes
In a trillion years from now.

The section Objects Meanwhile, discusses a black hole swallowing an entire galaxy. And when you think, were there people in that galaxy, did they know what was about to happen to them and if so, what would they be thinking? We get wrapped up in things that maybe we should have a little bit more perspective on. If every single human on planet Earth was able to recognise that we are all just trapped on a rock that’s being flung through space, maybe we’d have a different worldview. But the human race is so complex, I’m not going to go there.

MS: That section is looking at humans and what we’re doing on Earth before we go out into space. We meet the alien, and then after that we are presented with Earth. It’s not meant to be a future version of Earth. It’s meant to be a current version of Earth. I think it’s very easy to look at dystopian scenes of natural disasters, wars and climate change and think this is all set 20 years in the future, and we’ll work it out, we’ll be fine.

But actually, this stuff is happening now. It’s interesting that while all of these events are playing out and things are getting more and more serious, is enough being done by the human race to really set us on a course where we’re not just going to end up in that dystopian world of Interstellar, a global food crisis and dust storms that swirl around the planet, to the point where the planet is not habitable anymore. Are we barrelling towards that future, and is it too late to stop it? Thereโ€™s a lot of those classic narratives tied up in that section.

But of course presenting it in such a stark way on screen and moving through all of those environments is one way of really showing this is the state of things right now. Of course it’s dramatized a little bit with animation, and at the end you’ve got all of the figures stampeding and falling off a cliff. I mean take what you want from that.

The message of that section is that maybe the human race could be doing more, but then of course the human race is massively complex in itself. And there’s a lot of problems we need to work out. And I don’t think I’m the person to be able to offer the answers; but hopefully collectively, we can put differences behind us and actually try to work out these things.

‘And now in her old wedding bed/A lady will dream that her husband is dead/
Of course he’s alive/He’ll be back around five’

MS: The lyrics tell a story, but I’m very mindful about not just taking the lyrics and putting that into visuals. The lyrics tell such a wonderful story and the way it flows from scene to scene, I felt that had to be the way forward for that section. And by setting these small sequences but made out of stardust and put them into these cosmic-looking scenes, I hopefully created a quite a nice way of showing that.

That was one of the things we were talking about first. Stevenโ€™s note was he wanted to have everyday objects presented as though they were like a nebula or a galaxy out in space. So I was trying to build different ways of showing that. We had a Nebula Generator [which digital artists use to create configurable space nebula effects]. I could put a 3D model into it, and then it would render it as a galaxy or a nebula out in space.

Her shopping bag broke sending eggs and flour crashing
Down to the ground, just like star clusters smashing.

And I wanted there to be moments like the opening where the shopping bag falls and then the flour spreads out and there’s stars inside of that. I really wanted it to look like we were seeing like the birth of a galaxy or the birth of stars or something like that, where an event on Earth has a parallel to events out in space, visually at least.

MS: A lot of the designs come from Hajoโ€™s artwork. There are various sections and we wanted to have a journey, especially in the section, where we’ve got Randy McStine’s fantastic guitar solo, just after the Ark sequence where we go into an alien planet and we see the ghost on the moor again. For that sequence, I really wanted to put the viewer into that environment. And the idea there is that we had launched ourselves towards the end of the galaxy into the end of the universe, and now we’re flying back and landing on some other planet somewhere else. That was definitely trying to bring in as many of the colourful possibilities that alien worlds could have and just trying to realise that, and trying to show what it could look like.

I think a lot of these things were so influenced by films that we’ve seen already and designs that have been made, but also there’s probably limits to what we can imagine these alien worlds would look like because we are only influenced by what we see directly around us.

MS: The James Webb Telescope and the Hubble Space Telescope have been taking some absolutely fantastic images which are available online where artists can use them. That was a massive resource to be able to look at and get inspiration from.

But for all of the scenes in โ€˜Perspectiveโ€™, especially the ones where we’re going through nebulas and the larger cosmic objects, what I’m doing there is creating what is called a Pyro simulation which creates these kind of smoke effects. And that is driven off images and source material that’s taken from these incredible pictures of space.

And because they’re only two-dimensional images that we’ve got from these telescopes, what I wanted to be able to do is create that, but in a 3D space so I can fly a camera through it and we can see there’s some depth to it. I’m sure there’s probably some very technical way we could scientifically accurately do that. But imagine there’s just a slice of the photo or the image of that galaxy or that nebula, and then smoke starts to rise from both sides of that piece of paper that then creates this 3D object that I can then fly a camera into. I can then scatter stars inside of that as tiny little spheres that can then emit light, and that creates the effect of this 3D nebula.

MS: Yes! [laughs] One of the early notes that Steven gave me was that we didn’t want it to almost come across like an action figure, floating in space; but the actual range of motion you get in those space suits, there is only a certain amount of movement that you can do in zero gravity. But we added a little bit more movement into the character to try and hopefully reduce any sort of, ‘Look, it’s Buzz Lightyear floating out in space.’

That was really good fun. I think the idea for came from Steven – looking across the Earth initially and then just being pulled across time and space and then experiencing the entirety of everything in a flowing strand across the screen, and what that’s meant to represent is the passage of time in this thin thread that’s going across space. Steven falls into that thread and then visits the earth and all these different places and then falls in and out of that in space, which is quite disorientating in a way for him.

MS: I would probably share his fear of flying in a way, because I guess I think about it too much. You’re being rocketed in a tiny little capsule across the sky. But we’ve got ways of managing it, and everything’s tested. And when we know that the technology works, it’s amazing. We’ve had so many years of space exploration that it’s now coming to a point where weโ€™ve commercial astronauts going up and experiencing space. You don’t have to be a NASA-trained astronaut, you need a lot of money at the moment, but maybe one day it will be a point where we can maybe think about doing that, and maybe going on a trip to the moon won’t be something out of The Jetsons. It would be achievable for most people and a regular occurrence.

To answer your question, I think I’d have to think very carefully about whether I did it or not. I guess I like having my feet on solid ground. But I think if I were given the opportunity, I don’t think I’d be able to pass it up, because not many people get to experience something like that. So I probably would be saying yes.

MS: At the end, we’ve just had the Infinity Measured in Moments section, which is such a huge crescendo to the piece. There’s so much going on in that section and everything’s building up, and then we get this very soft end to the film where we’re floating in space.

After the visual onslaught of the ending section, because it is quite a lot and it is intended to make the viewer feel dizzy, it is blurry in sections where it is difficult to focus on it. That section was meant to be a ride through space where we can really just take a moment to consider the frame and see this asteroid that we’re flying down onto, and in the background of that scene, we have a huge black hole. And so we’re just one of the rocks that’s orbiting this black hole. Inevitably, these rocks are going to be sucked into that black hole and shredded.

And then as we reach the surface, we have this green shoot of life appearing in a place where it really shouldn’t. We really wanted to have some sort of ending where it wasn’t all about space as a cold, dark place, where it’s about death and nothing exists out there. I would like to think that there is more life out there and that the chances of there being life are quite high, especially when you look at how many solar systems and planets are out there. We wanted to leave it with somewhat of a positive view after diving into the darker aspects of it.

MS: Well, thereโ€™s always been the really big epic tracks at the end of Steven Wilson albums, but yes, it’s going in the opposite direction and putting something quiet has been very effective as well. It just feels like you’ve got that moment to just sit back and take in what you’ve just heard.

MS: When I was at school, I took music, but mainly music technology and production rather than a classical musical education. I was a kid who was trying to learn as much as I could on guitar, but I found all of the photography, video production, and animation side, and that’s what I ended up doing more music production than guitar. But I still play from time to time, and I still want to try and do something musically because I’ve been so fortunate to work with a lot of my musical heroes.

At some point, maybe I’ll decide to give music another shot. But it’s interesting you mentioned that, because I spent a lot of time listening through the music and finding the moments and following the music, and a lot of the time I find that as a filmmaker, you normally have to build your narrative structure, but what I’ve found is that the musicians have done that job for me. They’ve done the hard job of working out the journey that they’re taking the listener on; all I’m doing is just putting visuals to that story that they’ve already produced. As long as I can follow where the music is going and the moods and the styles of it, then I guess that’s all I need to know musically.

MS: I think the main thing with The Overview, as Steven will say as well, is the idea of having perspective on what we’re doing and our legacy on Earth. What if an alien was looking down at Earth, what would they see and what would they think about us and the way that we live?

It’s a story of sustainability and trying to really protect the home that we all have and trying to forge a path towards being a sustainable human race where we’re able to live in harmony with the planet. A lot of people have had that same dream. But we have to make that align with the way that civilization has to run; we’re going to be consuming a certain number of resources for the human race to exist.

But I think that as long as decisions are being made, we’re consuming the right resources in terms of animals, forests that we’re cutting down, what we’re putting in the oceans. It’s an environmental message, but also an animal rights message as well, where I think that humans, hopefully at some point in time, can look at our impacts on the world and hopefully see a nicer world around us.

MS: Yes, definitely that. We all get wrapped up in our own lives and everything can feel very overwhelming. You look at the news these days and it’s difficult to think we’re heading in the right direction. We are all just floating on a rock that’s flying through space. And as long as we can just be nice to each other – and I know that’s quite a naive thing to say –  but maybe that is the way that we have to look at the world, to take each problem as it comes and make the most empathetic response where we’re understanding our fellow humans on the planet, but also our fellow species on the planet, looking at animals and making sure that we’re providing the best world for us all to live in.

I feel like these days we have the technology to make a better world. And so it saddens me when I see that decisions are being made that are not maybe for the greater good of the planet, and it’s more just to make a bit more money, which only benefits a certain few.

I think there’s a lot of complexity in the human race, but I think that there’s definitely a message in The Overview, which is perspective; let’s try and forge a good path forward.

MS: I should also mention that I was assisted by my good friend Jack Hubbard, who helped me out with a lot of the more technical visual effects. We both worked on the film, and we were both there at the BFI IMAX show, and it was just an amazing thing to be able to share that experience with someone who has supported me massively over the years on pretty much every single project.

Jack is a visual effects artist who works at Framestore, one of the largest visual effects houses in London. He’s a very good friend and heโ€™s always up for a challenge and he was amazing in answering a lot of the more technical visual effects questions because he uses a more advanced 3D software than I do.

Part of the process of putting it into the cinema is that you have to follow a certain amount of spec and quality control to be able to put it in that sort of environment. And so a lot of what I’ve been learning about in terms of video production and filmmaking is how to produce content to that kind of high-resolution, high-quality scale, and of course Steven works with Dolby Atmos and all of the high-end audio standard. So throughout the production of The Overview, I was really keen to bring that kind of high res, high end workflow towards the visuals as well.

Jack works in high end visual effects for TV, film, and advertising. I try to bring as many of those workflows from these high-end visual effects productions into the work that I do, which is much smaller scale, but it’s amazing what anyone can now access on YouTube software that’s freely available. And you can just follow these same standards and quality processes that feature films go through.

We had a test day at the Dolby showroom in London, where we screened the first version of the film and listened to it back in the Atmos mix. And it was fascinating talking to them about the Dolby Vision and the Dolby Atmos standards that they produce, the high-end HDR imagery. And then also the high-resolution surround audio.

Maybe that’s next on my list of things to do, to try and work out how I produce the highest quality image possible. I know that if you’ve got a Dolby Vision capable TV, there is a way that we could start to create a version of The Overview so that future projects could be Dolby Atmos, but also Dolby Vision as well. I’d love that.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity. All stills from the film provided courtesy of Miles Skarin, with thanks.

For posts on Steven Wilson’s space music, see Space Songs Part I: The Porcupine Tree Years and Space Songs Part II: The Solo Years.

This post was edited on 2 August 2025 to include details about the design of the alien and the shapes in ‘Objects Meanwhile’ provided by Miles Skarin and again on 4 August 2025 to add a link to the Official Video for The Overview: Perspective.

Interview – Malcolm Galloway from Hats Off Gentlemen It’s Adequate on the new album The Uncertainty Principle and the Prog the Forest Festival

The Cover of the Uncertainty Principle by Hats Off Gentlemen It’s Adequate

Malcolm Galloway is the lead singer, songwriter, guitarist and keyboard-player of London-based prog rock band Hats Off Gentlemen It’s Adequate, with bass player Mark Gatland.

Nick Holmes Music met with Galloway in London to discuss the band’s latest album The Uncertainty Principle and the band’s annual Prog the Forest festival, which takes place at the Fiddler’s Elbow in London. (For a review of last year’s festival, see here.)

Malcolm Galloway

Nick Holmes Music: You have just announced another Prog the Forest festival for December 2025. Tell me about last yearโ€™s event.

MG: It’s our annual environmental charity fundraiser. We raise funds for the World Land Trust. This charity works in collaboration with local partners and local communities to buy threatened land that’s environmentally significant. It puts it into a legally protected permanent trust so that it can be used for the benefit of local communities and the environment. This has an impact on the climate. They focus on strategically important areas, for example, providing bridges between two isolated bits of ecosystem that may not, in isolation, be sustainable. But if there’s a small but significant bridge between them, it can then become a much more thriving ecosystem.

The organisers of this event are Mark Gatland and me from Hats Off Gentlemen It’s Adequate and Chris Parkins, the London Prog Gigs promoter. He’s a wonderful promoter of independent progressive music in London. I think he’s one of the main driving forces behind the resurgence of independent new progressive music in London. Last year was our sixth year and the most financially successful to date. We raised enough to protect 26.25 acres of threatened habitat.

So, we’re really pleased, and we’re delighted with all the performers who so kindly gave their time and talents to the event. We’re very fortunate to get such extraordinary musicians agreeing to come and play our little festival. We’ve developed so we’ve got an audience that is aware of the event and regularly comes and seems to be very, very supportive of the musicians. I really enjoy the atmosphere there.

Nick Holmes Music: It felt very supportive. Several of the musicians, after playing their set, hung around to listen to the other sets.

MG: Yes. There are quite a few musicians who come along even in years when they’re not performing.

Nick Holmes Music: It felt to me also like an artistic success – you had everything from solo jazz flute to something bordering on heavy metal, to acoustic covers of Rush songs.

MG: One of the lovely things about being involved in this kind of event is that we can put on things that we want to listen to. Also, the prog audience, from our experience, is open-minded and I really like that.

We know that if we put on a band that’s let’s say, veering into the more metal area or one that’s more folky or acoustic, or that uses skulls as percussion instruments – the wonderfully theatrical Spriggan Mist – the audience will appreciate them.

One year, we had John Etheridge, who is obviously very familiar to prog audiences from his prog work, but he was doing a set with Vimala Rowe, a wonderful jazz singer. And so, we feel that although there’s a centre of gravity in prog rock for the event, the idea is for it to be progressive in a wide sense, and it really aims to be quite diverse.

I was certainly pleased with the range and the diversity we had last year, and I like the idea that people might hear a genre they’ve never heard before and come away thinking, ‘I didn’t expect to like that. I now really want to go and check that out.’

Nick Holmes Music: I spoke to a couple of members of the band Mountainscape. They told me their set was mild by their standards, and that they can play much, much heavier than that. Did you ask them to do that?

MG: We didn’t ask them to, but it’s an interesting question. To what extent do you tailor your set according to the event? When we’re thinking about our sets at other events, we’re certainly aware of what kind of event it is. We’ve done things like art galleries, where we play a different kind of set compared to playing at something like a metal festival. But when we’re doing prog festivals, we feel able to have quite a broad palette that we can include in the event.

I don’t think we’ve ever tried to suggest to any of the performers what they do or don’t do. But I could also understand if they know the kind of event it is, they might have prog and more metal elements, and they might then focus more on the prog elements.

Nick Holmes Music: Thinking of the Hats Off Set at Prog the Forest, you’ve adapted some of your sets to the fact that you didn’t have a keyboard?

MG: Itโ€™s just a practical consideration. I’m probably better at the keyboard than the guitar, realistically, but the guitar is much easier to carry because it tends to be a bit lighter. I don’t particularly like playing a non-weighted keyboard, it’s not what I’m used to under the fingers. On the other hand, weighted keyboards are beyond my lifting capacity. And because I can’t drive, if we’re playing in a venue that has a keyboard, I’ll probably include some keyboard parts, not necessarily songs where the keyboard is a focus on the album, but I’ll do some more solos on keyboard rather than guitar.

Sometimes we do sets where we perform a first half keyboard-oriented and a second half guitar-oriented, such as at the Camden Club. They’ve got a nice keyboard there.

Hats Off Gentlemen It's Adequate at The Camden Club
Hats Off Gentlemen It’s Adequate at the Camden Club, London

Nick Holmes Music: Tell me about recording the new album, The Uncertainty Principle.

MG: The way that Mark and I work, it’s an iterative process, so I will send him a version of a mix, and he will come back with suggestions, and point out for instance where I’ve accidentally turned off a track. So, for example, we had a track which was going quite well, and I spent lot of time spent trying to get rid of digital clicks that seem to arise, horrible mouth noises that I don’t like. I managed to get rid of them, but in doing so I’d accidentally deleted half the guitar solo. So then I had to go back to try to find out where it went. Thatโ€™s the process until we gradually get to a point where weโ€™re both happy.

Nick Holmes Music: Who has the final say?

MG: We’ve not had anything where we have particularly disagreed so far. That hasn’t been an issue, it tends to be consensual. I think, though, that Mark will often be the one saying, ‘That’s fine, you don’t need to keep tinkering.’ Thereโ€™s a temptation to keep making tiny changes, but that comes with the risk of accidentally creating bigger mistakes than the problem Iโ€™m trying to fix.

Once we think all the tracks are finished, then we’re checking that the levels on each track sound right compared to each other, or if anything stands out as being a different kind of sonic world, where we might need to go back and change that in the mix, even if it worked for that song in isolation. We want things to work for the album as whole as well, so a little bit of compromise and balancing at that point.

Nick Holmes Music: When you reach that stage where it’s almost done, do you ever either radically change the running order, or even drop a track? Steven Wilson on The Future Bites  dropped a track at very short notice. And for the new Cure album, Songs of a Lost World, Robert Smith got as far as printing the lyrics and then dropped the track Bodiam Sky so if you buy the physical album, the lyrics for that missing track are still there.

MG: That’s interesting. We’ve never done anything that late. Normally we have to cut down the amount of material that we want to include to what fits on a CD.

This also feeds into why we haven’t got any releases on vinyl. There are two main reasons. One is that for obscure bands with limited potential sales, the unit cost becomes probably more than 10 times the price of a CD.

The other reason is that because of the length of our albums, each one would have to be a double album. It would be a lovely thing to have and stick up on the wall, but it would be quite expensive for anybody to buy.

We normally have more material than we can fit, so we’re having to trim things and drop things, but we also work hard to make sure that there’s a flow and shape to the albums. So, we had a track, Helgoland [that later became the B-side of the single Between Two Worlds] that we both like, but just in terms of the shape of the album, it made more sense not to include it. It was an instrumental and in terms of the narrative of the album, it would have meant overbalancing one part of the album in terms of instrumentals versus vocal tracks. Although you have an affection for the things you’ve created, you also don’t want to make the album less strong by forcing in things that don’t fit.

The other aspect is the packaging because we’re an independent nano label. When I say a record label, I don’t mean anything very commercial. It means my laptop, my very creaking 10-year-old laptop, and stuffing envelopes. It’s not particularly glamorous.

We design all the artwork and the packaging, and it always comes as a pleasant surprise to me with these very complicated-looking Photoshop templates, trying to make sure that the right bit of the booklets, where it all gets glued, overlap so that actually everything lines up. I don’t find that at all intuitive. Mark and I design these together, and then he does a little mock-up with glue and scissors to check that what we’re sending off to the printers isn’t going to come back looking like complete rubbish, hopefully.

Thatโ€™s also an iterative process. I’ll write something and send a draft to Mark, ‘OK, well, there’s a spelling mistake here, and oh, there’s a space before a comma here. You need to get rid of that’, magnifying these things on the screen and trying to find these tiny little things without accidentally making it worse.

The cover of Between Two Worlds, released as a single on 29 January 2025

Nick Holmes Music: Tell me about a track that you have played live a few times, Between Two Worlds.

MG: Itโ€™s by far the least twiddly and complicated and technical song on the album. It’s just me with a piano, plus some strings and a very subtle synth pad. We found it the most difficult one to record. I think people might assume that the more complicated stuff is the hardest, but that isn’t necessarily the case, when something is very exposed, like in that song where it’s quite quiet and the voice doesn’t have anything to hide behind.

To me, it’s quite an emotional song. It’s about somebody being in an MRI scanner. I don’t know if you’re familiar with how MRIs work, but itโ€™s all based on quantum physics. The whole theme of the album relates to quantum physics, the uncertainty principle. It sounds very abstract and unreal, but every day thousands of people are having scans that are affecting their lives with this technology that builds a picture of what’s going on inside your body based on flipping the spin of your hydrogen nuclei. And it just sounds so science fiction. It doesn’t sound like a real thing, but it’s just so routine and we don’t often think about it.

The back story that I had for the song was a person who has had cancer, has had treatment, has had a rough time and is having a scan to find out whether it’s spread or whether the treatmentโ€™s been successful. Itโ€™s the Schrรถdinger’s Cat idea. If you’re in a closed system, and something happens at a random quantum level, can it be said from the outside to have happened, not happened, or both at the same time?

The nature of certain things at the quantum level is extremely counterintuitive. It sounds a bit ridiculous but there does seem to be good evidence for it, although not necessarily on a macroscopic level.

In the context of the song, the whole Cat thing is meant to be metaphorical. I think it was originally used as a criticism of the theory rather than a way of advocating for it. Just because something can happen at the level of a tiny particle doesn’t mean it happens for a person or a cat.

But as an analogy, we’ve got somebody inside a scanner, and these results are being generated on a computer somewhere. Until somebody looks at them, they exist between these two future selves.

I’ve had some experiences, but not quite as terrible as that on a personal level, situations where, depending on how a binary choice goes, that’s outside of your control, your life takes one path or another. So that song was inspired by the awful uncertainty of people in that kind of situation, including far too many family and friends.

We did a version that we really liked, except it was done on a real acoustic piano and it had a very squeaky sustain pedal, so itโ€™s got this really emotional stuff going on and all this ‘squeak, squeak.’ I spent ages trying to edit it out the squeak, which was probably a waste of time because it just made it sound artificial. If you had lots of drums and synthesisers and twiddly guitar solos, you probably could have hidden that I’d removed the squeak.

So I then tried with a home electric piano, which was better, but I probably sing better standing up, and I can’t do that while I’m playing the piano. So I was trying to do the piano part first, then do the vocal on top of it. But then it’s a song that’s meant to be quite fluid rather than just sticking to a metronome. So then I tried to record it, piano first without a metronome, then sitting the vocals on top, but trying to concentrate on remembering what the piano was about to do while singing distracted me from the meaning of the words.

And then we tried it on guitar, and that came close to being used as a guitar and voice version. However, it still didn’t quite feel like what we wanted. Then we tried bigger arrangements, and then it felt like it was overblown.  In the final version, some subtle strings are blended in, but it is largely voice and piano.

We went through quite a few different key change options because the lowest parts of the song fit my voice in the morning, and the later parts of the song I can only really do in the evening, but ideally you want it to be more of a one take feel, so we had to find a compromise that was near enough for both bits.

Nick Holmes Music: Tell me about the title track, The Uncertainty Principle.

MG: It starts ominously, and when we play it live, we don’t do much other than the harmonised vocal in that initial section. Then the guitars and bass come in, and it gets a bit more hectic. It ends with a solo that isn’t the usual kind of solo I would do. There are certain things that your fingers are comfortable with, and you can do that kind of thing without really thinking about it. And then there are other things where you write it.

Most of my solos take a more intuitive approach, but this one was more written, choosing specific notes. So that was a bit of a challenge to remember to play the right notes rather than just the usual blues scales.

Nick Holmes Music: Did you create that solo by comping it together from lots of different versions, or did it just flow as you wrote it?

MG: I built up the idea of it, and then it was done in one take. I think the whole melody was in one take.

Nick Holmes Music: Does the new album have a concept or a narrative structure?

MG: It starts with Certainty, which is kind of a scene-setting song about the change in the philosophy of science, when the idea of uncertainty, being an inherent property of reality, became mainstream science. We extrapolate from that into uncertainty in more interpersonal and psychological aspects, which I acknowledge is a scientific liberty, but it’s still the idea that certainty in various fields has been shown to be a less reliable interpretation of reality than is typically assumed.

I think you could argue that there is an increasing understanding of the unreliability of our own introspection in psychology, our certainty about ourselves. Freud gets credited with pioneering an emphasis on our unconscious drives, although he wasn’t the first person to address unconscious influences in human behaviour.

If you look at false memories, it shows how we can be fairly easily manipulated into being pretty certain of things that are demonstrably not true. So uncertainty in its various manifestations is the overriding theme, and the first song introduces that theme.

Everything Changed develops the uncertainty principle theme. Then we have an instrumental, The Ultraviolet Catastrophe, a very dramatic name. It describes emission spectra not fitting the theoretical model of classical Physics. It doesn’t sound very catastrophic. In Physics, I’m a layperson. I have an interest in the history of science, and the philosophy of science but I’m not a Physics expert, but basically at the beginning of the 20th century, you had predictions that were made based on the understanding of Physics at the time, which were completely incompatible with what was being found by experiments, and this was seen to be a catastrophe.

The Cover of Copenhagen by Hats Off Gentlemen It's Adequate
The Cover of Copenhagen, released as a single on 11 June 2024

Then it moves to Copenhagen and we’re moving chronologically as the album goes on. The song is about the disputed conversation during WW2 between Werner Heisenberg, head of the German nuclear programme and his former mentor Niels Bohr.

The next song is the title track The Uncertainty Principle. So we’ve taken the character of Heisenberg from Copenhagen. A few years later, he’s being hunted by Moe Berg, the American spy and former professional baseball player, who was sent to attend a public lecture Heisenberg gave in Zurich at which he was supposed to decide whether to assassinate him, based on how close he was to developing a nuclear bomb.

Quite why a former professional baseball player who then become a spy is in a position to judge from a public lecture whether or not somebody is on the verge of building nuclear bomb, seems to be quite a bizarre thing. But Berg turns up in Zurich with his pistol in his jacket and with his mission, and he decides not to assassinate Heisenberg. We now know in retrospect that they weren’t particularly close to developing the bomb.

Throughout the album we have that recurrent theme of decision making under conditions of uncertainty. All that was influenced by my work in medicine in the past, where I was involved in teaching about misdiagnosis, where these issues of certainty and confidence were a major issue in misdiagnosis. And there are references in the lyrics throughout the album to lyrics of earlier songs on the album for the same characters.

Then we have another instrumental, Cause And Effect (But Not Necessarily In That Order).

Then we move forward a few years to The Think Tank. The song was very loosely inspired by the experiences of Daniel Ellsberg, who worked for a think tank called the RAND Corporation set up in the 1950s. It was a company set up by the American Air Force originally. It was one of the first think tanks where the government employs them to do research on strategic things. And one of their jobs was designing nuclear war planning.

Ellsberg wrote about his experiences of working in that industry, and he described the feeling that it seemed like an ordinary, nice office job in an academic environment. Everyone’s very polite and friendly, very sympathetic and full of empathy. But then, a few minutes later, their job is working out where to target the missiles at particular towns on the other side to maximise casualties.

He described an experience where he suddenly had that sense of being outside of yourself, looking and thinking, what am I doing? What are we doing here? All these very normal, nice people using their very powerful minds to try and plan how to wipe out hundreds of millions of people. And so later on, he became a whistleblower.

The song was very loosely based on his description of his experience of that jarring disconnect of doing something he thought was monstrous in a very normal office environment. This was planning for an atrocity that, fortunately, so far hasn’t happened, but perhaps you can imagine people involved in other atrocities, where within that group they’re empathic to each other, and in other ways act in a way we would consider very normal. It is easy for us to divide the world into us and them, and to accept or even contribute to appalling actions against the people we donโ€™t see as โ€˜usโ€™. The danger of dehumanising others is a recurrent theme in our songwriting.

But that individual song is quite playful sounding, even though the thematic material obviously isn’t very playful; it’s got a kind of retro, rocky type of feel, but not going back all the way to the 50s, which is when the actual song idea is set.

The Cover of One Word That Means the World (Arkhipov)
The Cover of One Word That Means The World (Arkhipov) released as a single on 5 April 2025

One Word That Means The World (Arkhipov) is definitely not playful sounding, but it’s maybe got a bit more of an 80’s rock type feel with the twiddly guitars and that kind of production. I know that the story isn’t set in the 80s, but on the other hand the difference in time between now and then is similar to the difference in time when I was growing up versus the events in the stories that we’re talking about. So that sense of sounding like it was made a few decades previously was an aesthetic choice aiming to reflect the setting of the story.

One Word That Means The World (Arkhipov) is about the Soviet submariner who refused to fire a nuclear weapon during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

That takes us to the end of the historical narrative, and we have a bit of a pause with an instrumental. And then we come to a sort of fictional now with the โ€˜between two worldsโ€™ of the person in an MRI machine, bringing together an element of the quantum story, plus something much more personal than what’s been in the rest of the album.

Nick Holmes Music: So, you’re going into fiction, but in Between Two Worlds are you also drawing on your past experience and your teaching? 

MG: Iโ€™ve had a lot of experience unfortunately of cancer-related things in terms of family bereavement and friends, and also having been a cancer doctor, and I have had lots of scans for various things myself, though I’m not claiming I’ve had anything as awful as a lot of people in that kind of situation. But those were the influences that went into that song.

And then the last song is Living with Uncertainty. I know a lot of our thematic content is on the darker side, but we try to end the albums, I’m not saying with a happy ending, but at least with a glimmer of hope, we don’t just make it completely depressing.

Living with Uncertainty is meant to round it off and it does have some lyrical quotes from earlier in the album. It’s about acknowledging that living with uncertainty is an inherent part of life. It’s difficult – it’s very comforting to grab onto something and say, ‘well, I’m certain of this, regardless of any evidence’, but the song aims to argue that we don’t have to think we’ve always got all the answers.

I’m not saying that we shouldn’t be intellectually curious and trying to find things out. I’m very pro science, but it would be a fundamentally unscientific approach to think that you can always be certain. In most things in life, I suspect if we questioned, why might we be wrong rather than always looking for ways to justify that we are right, we might get along with each other better as a species.

Nick Holmes Music: Does that bring a kind of peace then, if you can reconcile yourself to that?

MG:  I would say it’s something I aspire to rather than necessarily achieve. I’m not some kind of entirely calm guru; I’m a very anxious person. If I lived in the way that the song would suggest, I’d probably be happier than if I lived in the way that I usually manage. So, I’m certainly not preaching, saying you should be like me, but I do consciously try to challenge my own assumptions.

It’s very easy to think people are excessively certain of things. But it’s very rare that people apply that to people they agree with, or to themselves. It’s very easy to say – whichever political viewpoint you have, or whichever your preferred genre of music, or any kind of polarising thing – ‘that person is wrong to be really sure of themselves’, but not to apply the same principle to the people you agree with.

The Uncertainty Principle is out now. Prog the Forest takes place at the Fiddler’s Elbow, Camden, London at 13.30 on Saturday 6 December 2025.

Interview – Miles Skarin: Creating ‘The Overview’ film with Steven Wilson

A still from The Overview film directed by Miles Skarin

Miles Skarin makes music videos for Steven Wilson and his band Porcupine Tree. He also designs websites such as Stevenwilsonhq with his brother, Rob Skarin. Miles has recently made a full-length animated film to accompany Wilson’s latest solo album, The Overview. The film has been shown during the tour to support the new album, and the track Objects: Meanwhile from the first song on the new album Objects Outlive Us has been released as an official video.

Nick Holmes Music has been given an exclusive insight into the making of the new film with Miles Skarin [MS].

MS: We go back about ten years or so. We originally started out as massive Porcupine Tree fans. We made the fan site starsdie.com. Being big fans of Porcupine Tree, Steven Wilson, and the other progressive rock bands at the time, we made a couple of fan sites. We really wanted to know everything about Steven and Porcupine Tree, and where the music was coming from because we just loved it so much. A lot of these bands hadn’t really taken off on social media at the time.

Miles Skarin
Miles Skarin

My brother wrote a load of the news articles for the website. I did a lot of the design work. And then one day we had an e-mail that dropped into the inbox. That was Steven saying, “Hey, you guys are doing this really well, do you want to come on board and help us out?” Which was incredible as fans, to have that message just land in your inbox, it was a fantastic day. And so we just jumped at the chance. We redesigned Steven’s website and tried to boost his presence on social media, and we’ve been helping with that ever since.

MS:  I think that was what he said. I think it was just because we were putting way more content onto our website. One of the things that we were thinking about was that every now and again you’d have an album release. And then after the album cycle there would be nothing posted online. Maybe a year, two years later, thereโ€™d be another album and maybe there’d be some press.

Steven always did incredible box sets. There was always a massive wealth of artwork and stuff to complement the music. So it was just a way of keeping fans engaged with Steven, even outside of the album cycles. And also while on tour as well, making sure to post photos and updates from live shows and just build that online community.

We had a forum at one point which we really enjoyed doing because it was bringing fans together and talking about the music that we loved. Through that process we met a few more people in the progressive rock space, record labels like Inside Out Music, Sony and Kscope; Steven was on working with those guys through Blackfield and his own releases at the time.

MS: Oh wow. It’s just the peak, isn’t it? As a filmmaker, it doesn’t get better than that, surely. It was such an incredible experience, to see your work on a screen that’s the size of a building is something that I didn’t think I’d ever experience. As I was delivering the DCP file you take to give to the cinema to put it on the screen, the projectionist, Michael, took me up into the projection room at the back of the IMAX. And that’s cinema history, because you’ve got all of Christopher Nolan films; these huge spools of film, and they’re just labelled with handwritten notes saying โ€˜Tenetโ€™, โ€˜Inceptionโ€™ and โ€˜Interstellar.โ€™ it was just an absolutely wonderful experience to know that my film was going to be on the same screen.

I feel so fortunate and lucky to have to have been able to do it and it’s all thanks to Steven, for creating the music and placing his trust in me to do a film, hopefully that does some sort of justice to the incredible music that he produces.

MS: I think he always saw it as a piece that was two halves, side one and side two. When we were talking about visuals for it, one of the things that we were talking about was if you’ve got two 20-minute-long songs there isn’t really a concept of singles. So the idea of doing a promotional single didn’t really apply. Of course we went with the Objects Outlive Us section Objects: Meanwhile as a single.


Steven Wilson – Objects Outlive Us: Objects: Meanwhile

From the start, Steven wanted there to be visual material, a film to go across the entire audio, which is such an incredible challenge to have to try and think about, because especially in my style, which is animation that’s a big undertaking. It was always from the start, โ€œlet’s make a film, let’s make a movie for this.โ€

MS: I’ve always loved space. I’ve always been aware of space, been aware of missions into space and where we are in space, and galaxies and solar systems. So I think there’s a lot of knowledge I had already accumulated about space. I really wanted to build that kind of idea of scale into the film as well, because that was what we were trying to produce from the start, the idea of perspective.

And so I was looking up scales in numbers of how large planets are on Wikipedia. You can search any star or planet and it will tell you in astronomical units how large that planet or star is. And the numbers get big very quickly. I tried putting all those numbers into my computer software thinking, โ€œthis will be great. I’ll just put all the numbers in and then I can just pull the camera out and that would show me the scale.โ€ But it starts to glitch physically on the screen. It can’t work out the coordinates for the polygons and the shapes you’re making to exist in a space that large because the computers can’t handle the sheer size of it.

So I was trying to find out as much as I could about space, and trying to keep it very scientific in a way. But as soon as I realised it was going to need a certain level of artistic direction, because the software couldn’t handle it, I had to kind of deviate. But I did definitely try to keep as much of the scientific information there, and I was also looking into different phenomena and objects in space; one of them is called a magnetar, which is these incredibly dense stars which have a very strong magnetic field. And it’s fascinating reading about these objects in space that just don’t seem real. And yet they are out there somewhere. It was very enjoyable doing that.

Sunrise seen from space. Illustration inspired by the opening scene of Stanley Kubrick's film 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Sunrise seen from space. Illustration inspired by the opening scene of Stanley Kubrick’s film 2001: A Space Odyssey. Image by Michael Melchinger. Source Wikimedia Commons

MS: Those films are incredible. I would say those films would be my main inspiration and reference points for The Overview. I remember watching Interstellar in the cinema and being absolutely blown away by it, not just visually from how it depicts space, but also the performance of the actors as well, and the emotion, and the effect that time dilation would have on people experiencing it. They did that very, very well.

I guess our challenge was to try and create a new visual language. But the person I have to thank for most of that is Hajo [Mรผller] who had already created all this incredible artwork. It’s so stark and beautiful in the way that he’s used real imagery and texture to create the pieces. I love the large formats images that Hajo produced to really give you that sense of a wide screen or cinematic format. He sent through a load of the artwork quite early in the process. His artwork by the time that I was really working with it was already mostly there and just incredible images. I was looking at that and thinking he’s done it, he’s created the visual language of The Overview and if I can even get a small piece of that into my film then I’ll be happy because I love his work.

MS: I think the main piece that really shows the scale would be Perspective, the first section of the second half. We’ve got Rotem [Wilson]’s voice, speaking through these incredible numbers such as ten to the power of twelve. But what does that mean? And so one of the things we were talking about was by putting up that number onto the screen, do people know that that’s going to be? The number of zeros that are at the end of these numbers, your brain can’t process it that well. And so when we were thinking of showing the scales, I had to split up those sequences and of course it has to be stylized to the music as well.

But there’s one moment where you can see the sun and you can see the different rings of the orbits of our planets in our solar system. And the camera bounces back and bounces forward quite fast. One of the things that I’m not sure if people quite catch is that our Sun just shrinks by a huge amount and then these absolutely colossal stars that are the next scale up swirl into the frame. So even on a 4K screen, placing these objects next to each other, our Sun suddenly becomes minuscule against these larger stars out there. So it’s actually very difficult to have a reference point when you’re looking at these sorts of visuals in a way that really puts it in perspective for us humans to understand.

The other part of the film that talks about scale is the section called Cosmic Suns of Toil which is midway through the first half. For that we’ve got the camera that just pulls back and goes through all the different layers of space. I wanted to frame our solar system and then what’s outside of our solar system. This is where I was doing my research on what these layers are, if I set a course for the stars and kept going, what objects would I move through. As you get outside of our solar system, there’s The Local Bubble, and The Local Cluster.

It’s amazing to consider that there’s so many other stars and solar systems out there, and then it just keeps going and keeps going until we can’t see any further because light can’t travel. There’s a certain amount of light that it can travel compared to how fast the speed of light is and that’s elapsed. Then eventually at the end of that section, Cosmic Suns of Toil, we reach the edge of the Cosmic Web, which is these, almost like strand filaments of the matter of galaxies.

And then what’s on the outside? We don’t know. So we have a slightly more abstract, stylized section and then we just dive straight down. The thing that I find amazing about that is it’s set up to be relative scale, not absolute scale. So when the camera flies straight back through the Local Cluster of our solar system and then back onto Earth, all of that’s over in about like three or four frames of video. Itโ€™s incredible that we cross so much distance in the space of a millisecond.

The Alien on the moor

MS: I feel like it’s a great way to introduce where we are right now as a species. I think the key takeaway from the film is that we look inwards so much, and when you look outwards at space there’s so much out there which is unattainable and unreachable for a lot of humans, so maybe we don’t give much thought to the perspective of what we are and what our reality is. I don’t know how many people in the modern age are looking up at space and thinking, “I know what’s up there and I know what that means about where I am.”



Every time I go outside and walk down to the end of my road at night, and I’ve got stars above me, I’m always looking up and thinking, โ€œthat’s all right there.โ€ I feel like that’s a great moment to start the record and say we’re not looking at humans this time around. We know we’re looking out at space, but then we are looking back at what that means for the human race.

A teenager with his first telescope

And there with his first telescope
A teenager stands full of hormones and hope
As he squints at the night, like a painting of light
He doesn’t suppose that a black hole implodes
In a trillion years from now.

The section Objects Meanwhile, discusses a black hole swallowing an entire galaxy. And when you think, were there people in that galaxy, did they know what was about to happen to them and if so, what would they be thinking? We get wrapped up in things that maybe we should have a little bit more perspective on. If every single human on planet Earth was able to recognise that we are all just trapped on a rock that’s being flung through space, maybe we’d have a different worldview. But the human race is so complex, I’m not going to go there.

MS: That section is looking at humans and what we’re doing on Earth before we go out into space. We meet the alien, and then after that we are presented with Earth. It’s not meant to be a future version of Earth. It’s meant to be a current version of Earth. I think it’s very easy to look at dystopian scenes of natural disasters, wars and climate change and think this is all set 20 years in the future, and we’ll work it out, we’ll be fine.

But actually, this stuff is happening now. It’s interesting that while all of these events are playing out and things are getting more and more serious, is enough being done by the human race to really set us on a course where we’re not just going to end up in that dystopian world of Interstellar, a global food crisis and dust storms that swirl around the planet, to the point where the planet is not habitable anymore. Are we barrelling towards that future, and is it too late to stop it? Thereโ€™s a lot of those classic narratives tied up in that section.

But of course presenting it in such a stark way on screen and moving through all of those environments is one way of really showing this is the state of things right now. Of course it’s dramatized a little bit with animation, and at the end you’ve got all of the figures stampeding and falling off a cliff. I mean take what you want from that.

The message of that section is that maybe the human race could be doing more, but then of course the human race is massively complex in itself. And there’s a lot of problems we need to work out. And I don’t think I’m the person to be able to offer the answers; but hopefully collectively, we can put differences behind us and actually try to work out these things.

‘And now in her old wedding bed/A lady will dream that her husband is dead/
Of course he’s alive/He’ll be back around five’

MS: The lyrics tell a story, but I’m very mindful about not just taking the lyrics and putting that into visuals. The lyrics tell such a wonderful story and the way it flows from scene to scene, I felt that had to be the way forward for that section. And by setting these small sequences but made out of stardust and put them into these cosmic-looking scenes, I hopefully created a quite a nice way of showing that.

That was one of the things we were talking about first. Stevenโ€™s note was he wanted to have everyday objects presented as though they were like a nebula or a galaxy out in space. So I was trying to build different ways of showing that. We had a Nebula Generator [which digital artists use to create configurable space nebula effects]. I could put a 3D model into it, and then it would render it as a galaxy or a nebula out in space.

Her shopping bag broke sending eggs and flour crashing
Down to the ground, just like star clusters smashing.

And I wanted there to be moments like the opening where the shopping bag falls and then the flour spreads out and there’s stars inside of that. I really wanted it to look like we were seeing like the birth of a galaxy or the birth of stars or something like that, where an event on Earth has a parallel to events out in space, visually at least.

MS: A lot of the designs come from Hajoโ€™s artwork. There are various sections and we wanted to have a journey, especially in the section, where we’ve got Randy McStine’s fantastic guitar solo, just after the Ark sequence where we go into an alien planet and we see the ghost on the moor again. For that sequence, I really wanted to put the viewer into that environment. And the idea there is that we had launched ourselves towards the end of the galaxy into the end of the universe, and now we’re flying back and landing on some other planet somewhere else. That was definitely trying to bring in as many of the colourful possibilities that alien worlds could have and just trying to realise that, and trying to show what it could look like.

I think a lot of these things were so influenced by films that we’ve seen already and designs that have been made, but also there’s probably limits to what we can imagine these alien worlds would look like because we are only influenced by what we see directly around us.

MS: The James Webb Telescope and the Hubble Space Telescope have been taking some absolutely fantastic images which are available online where artists can use them. That was a massive resource to be able to look at and get inspiration from.

But for all of the scenes in โ€˜Perspectiveโ€™, especially the ones where we’re going through nebulas and the larger cosmic objects, what I’m doing there is creating what is called a Pyro simulation which creates these kind of smoke effects. And that is driven off images and source material that’s taken from these incredible pictures of space.

And because they’re only two-dimensional images that we’ve got from these telescopes, what I wanted to be able to do is create that, but in a 3D space so I can fly a camera through it and we can see there’s some depth to it. I’m sure there’s probably some very technical way we could scientifically accurately do that. But imagine there’s just a slice of the photo or the image of that galaxy or that nebula, and then smoke starts to rise from both sides of that piece of paper that then creates this 3D object that I can then fly a camera into. I can then scatter stars inside of that as tiny little spheres that can then emit light, and that creates the effect of this 3D nebula.

MS: Yes! [laughs] One of the early notes that Steven gave me was that we didn’t want it to almost come across like an action figure, floating in space; but the actual range of motion you get in those space suits, there is only a certain amount of movement that you can do in zero gravity. But we added a little bit more movement into the character to try and hopefully reduce any sort of, ‘Look, it’s Buzz Lightyear floating out in space.’

That was really good fun. I think the idea for came from Steven – looking across the Earth initially and then just being pulled across time and space and then experiencing the entirety of everything in a flowing strand across the screen, and what that’s meant to represent is the passage of time in this thin thread that’s going across space. Steven falls into that thread and then visits the earth and all these different places and then falls in and out of that in space, which is quite disorientating in a way for him.

MS: I would probably share his fear of flying in a way, because I guess I think about it too much. You’re being rocketed in a tiny little capsule across the sky. But we’ve got ways of managing it, and everything’s tested. And when we know that the technology works, it’s amazing. We’ve had so many years of space exploration that it’s now coming to a point where weโ€™ve commercial astronauts going up and experiencing space. You don’t have to be a NASA-trained astronaut, you need a lot of money at the moment, but maybe one day it will be a point where we can maybe think about doing that, and maybe going on a trip to the moon won’t be something out of The Jetsons. It would be achievable for most people and a regular occurrence.

To answer your question, I think I’d have to think very carefully about whether I did it or not. I guess I like having my feet on solid ground. But I think if I were given the opportunity, I don’t think I’d be able to pass it up, because not many people get to experience something like that. So I probably would be saying yes.

MS: At the end, we’ve just had the Infinity Measured in Moments section, which is such a huge crescendo to the piece. There’s so much going on in that section and everything’s building up, and then we get this very soft end to the film where we’re floating in space.

After the visual onslaught of the ending section, because it is quite a lot and it is intended to make the viewer feel dizzy, it is blurry in sections where it is difficult to focus on it. That section was meant to be a ride through space where we can really just take a moment to consider the frame and see this asteroid that we’re flying down onto, and in the background of that scene, we have a huge black hole. And so we’re just one of the rocks that’s orbiting this black hole. Inevitably, these rocks are going to be sucked into that black hole and shredded.

And then as we reach the surface, we have this green shoot of life appearing in a place where it really shouldn’t. We really wanted to have some sort of ending where it wasn’t all about space as a cold, dark place, where it’s about death and nothing exists out there. I would like to think that there is more life out there and that the chances of there being life are quite high, especially when you look at how many solar systems and planets are out there. We wanted to leave it with somewhat of a positive view after diving into the darker aspects of it.

MS: Well, thereโ€™s always been the really big epic tracks at the end of Steven Wilson albums, but yes, it’s going in the opposite direction and putting something quiet has been very effective as well. It just feels like you’ve got that moment to just sit back and take in what you’ve just heard.

MS: When I was at school, I took music, but mainly music technology and production rather than a classical musical education. I was a kid who was trying to learn as much as I could on guitar, but I found all of the photography, video production, and animation side, and that’s what I ended up doing more music production than guitar. But I still play from time to time, and I still want to try and do something musically because I’ve been so fortunate to work with a lot of my musical heroes.

At some point, maybe I’ll decide to give music another shot. But it’s interesting you mentioned that, because I spent a lot of time listening through the music and finding the moments and following the music, and a lot of the time I find that as a filmmaker, you normally have to build your narrative structure, but what I’ve found is that the musicians have done that job for me. They’ve done the hard job of working out the journey that they’re taking the listener on; all I’m doing is just putting visuals to that story that they’ve already produced. As long as I can follow where the music is going and the moods and the styles of it, then I guess that’s all I need to know musically.

MS: I think the main thing with The Overview, as Steven will say as well, is the idea of having perspective on what we’re doing and our legacy on Earth. What if an alien was looking down at Earth, what would they see and what would they think about us and the way that we live?

It’s a story of sustainability and trying to really protect the home that we all have and trying to forge a path towards being a sustainable human race where we’re able to live in harmony with the planet. A lot of people have had that same dream. But we have to make that align with the way that civilization has to run; we’re going to be consuming a certain number of resources for the human race to exist.

But I think that as long as decisions are being made, we’re consuming the right resources in terms of animals, forests that we’re cutting down, what we’re putting in the oceans. It’s an environmental message, but also an animal rights message as well, where I think that humans, hopefully at some point in time, can look at our impacts on the world and hopefully see a nicer world around us.

MS: Yes, definitely that. We all get wrapped up in our own lives and everything can feel very overwhelming. You look at the news these days and it’s difficult to think we’re heading in the right direction. We are all just floating on a rock that’s flying through space. And as long as we can just be nice to each other – and I know that’s quite a naive thing to say –  but maybe that is the way that we have to look at the world, to take each problem as it comes and make the most empathetic response where we’re understanding our fellow humans on the planet, but also our fellow species on the planet, looking at animals and making sure that we’re providing the best world for us all to live in.

I feel like these days we have the technology to make a better world. And so it saddens me when I see that decisions are being made that are not maybe for the greater good of the planet, and it’s more just to make a bit more money, which only benefits a certain few.

I think there’s a lot of complexity in the human race, but I think that there’s definitely a message in The Overview, which is perspective; let’s try and forge a good path forward.

MS: I should also mention that I was assisted by my good friend Jack Hubbard, who helped me out with a lot of the more technical visual effects. We both worked on the film, and we were both there at the BFI IMAX show, and it was just an amazing thing to be able to share that experience with someone who has supported me massively over the years on pretty much every single project.

Jack is a visual effects artist who works at Framestore, one of the largest visual effects houses in London. He’s a very good friend and heโ€™s always up for a challenge and he was amazing in answering a lot of the more technical visual effects questions because he uses a more advanced 3D software than I do.

Part of the process of putting it into the cinema is that you have to follow a certain amount of spec and quality control to be able to put it in that sort of environment. And so a lot of what I’ve been learning about in terms of video production and filmmaking is how to produce content to that kind of high-resolution, high-quality scale, and of course Steven works with Dolby Atmos and all of the high-end audio standard. So throughout the production of The Overview, I was really keen to bring that kind of high res, high end workflow towards the visuals as well.

Jack works in high end visual effects for TV, film, and advertising. I try to bring as many of those workflows from these high-end visual effects productions into the work that I do, which is much smaller scale, but it’s amazing what anyone can now access on YouTube software that’s freely available. And you can just follow these same standards and quality processes that feature films go through.

We had a test day at the Dolby showroom in London, where we screened the first version of the film and listened to it back in the Atmos mix. And it was fascinating talking to them about the Dolby Vision and the Dolby Atmos standards that they produce, the high-end HDR imagery. And then also the high-resolution surround audio.

Maybe that’s next on my list of things to do, to try and work out how I produce the highest quality image possible. I know that if you’ve got a Dolby Vision capable TV, there is a way that we could start to create a version of The Overview so that future projects could be Dolby Atmos, but also Dolby Vision as well. I’d love that.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity. All stills from the film provided courtesy of Miles Skarin, with thanks.

For posts on Steven Wilson’s space music, see Space Songs Part I: The Porcupine Tree Years and Space Songs Part II: The Solo Years.

Interview: Malcolm Galloway of Prog Rock Band Hats Off Gentlemen It’s Adequate – Part II

Malcolm Galloway singing and playing live
Malcolm Galloway singing and playing live

Nick Holmes Music: What’s unique about the Hats Off sound? Rather than trying to categorise the sound within a genre, what makes it uniquely your band? 

I don’t know. I do find that a bit confusing. For example we play at quite a wide variety of different kind of events,ย from heavy metal events to Prog festivals, or to art galleries for the more instrumental side of what we do. Some songs might be just me and a piano and nothing else, and others, you know, 110 tracks of dense instrumentation.ย 

But in terms of the thing that makes it you, I meanย there might be certain harmonic habits, I suppose. I tend to like suspended seconds quite a lot!

Nick Holmes Music: Is there a guiding principle? Is there something you’re aiming at each time you start writing? 

No, it evolves. We hope each song stands up in its own right as well, but each song is intended to serve the album as an overall experience. Even acknowledging that people don’t necessarily often listen to albums in that way, but in in terms of the architecture of the of how it’s produced. 

Nick Holmes Music: Would you ever drop a song because it’s a good song, but it doesn’t fit in the musical/conceptual argument of the album?ย 

Yes. So for each of our albums so far, I think we’ve had more material than we could fit onto the album. I’m not saying there necessarily is an objective way of judging a best song, but it’s not just a question of, ‘we like this song.’ It’s about the shape of the album, and if it doesn’t serve the intended purpose at that place in the album, then we won’t include it. It might then come into a later album, or it might get released separately or become a B-side.

We have a stack of ideas that didn’t fit a particular album, but were written at the same time, and I’m usually working on multiple projects at a time. Even at the moment, I’m working on album number eight, but I’ve also been exploring ideas for the next one as well. ย 

Nick Holmes Music: Do you sometimes find you have to challenge yourself because it’s very easy to fall back on things that you’re comfortable with? Or are you happy to use those as building blocks, because you know they work?ย 

I’m not sure. I suppose sometimes there’s a song, and you really like it and itโ€™s really simple. I feel a bit uncomfortable releasing that because it’s so simple it must have been done before because it seems really obvious. And then I play it to various people and I think, โ€˜where have I stolen this from?โ€™ – accidentally, I donโ€™t deliberately steal. And Mark [Gatland] is fairly encyclopaedic in his knowledge of popular music. If he doesn’t recognise it, then it’s probably just that there are certain shapes of phrases that are fairly ubiquitous, but not necessarily somebody else’s.ย 

Nick Holmes Music: Do you ever think it would be nice to write prog rock in strange time signatures such as7/8 or 14/16? Or do you just find yourself writing something and thinking, โ€˜That’s not in the standard 4/4?’ย 

Usually it’s a question of writing something that feels right for the theme that we’re aiming for and then if that isn’t 4/4, that’s fine.ย I don’t think we would start being like โ€˜Oh, I’d really like to write a piece in 17/8 or whatever. But it might be, โ€˜This is an interesting rhythmic pattern.โ€™ And then exploring that and sometimes the rhythmic pattern might come from a phrase, like in listening to an audio book. And there’s a certain rhythm to a phrase or a certain sense of a melody in a phrase, and that will set off an idea for a song. That’s more often how it would be rather than starting off as an exercise, ‘I want to write a canon’ or whatever.ย 

Nick Holmes Music: So the kind of thing that Steve Reich was doing on Different Trains, using speech rhythms and then feeding them into a musical idea? 

I think so, and Steve Reich is a big influence on me.

Nick Holmes Music: So does your classical knowledge and interest feed into your rock writing? 

I used to think that they were very separate, but then it was pointed out to me that actually there was quite a lot of overlap. And as [the band’s] albums have developed, thereโ€™s become more and more overlap. Not necessarily in the โ€˜songyโ€™ bits, butย particularly in the instrumental parts. ย 

Nick Holmes Music: So how would you know whether something that you’re working on, an idea that comes to your head, is going on a minimalist album in your own name, or it’s going to go on a Hats Off album? 

If it’s short, it’ll probably be one of the burbly bits between the songs on a Hats Off album! If itโ€™s – like when we were talking about Steve Reich – a rigorously worked out overlapping repeated pattern, developing emergent phase properties over 50 minutes or so, then it’ll probably fit better on one of my solo albums.ย 

So far none of my solo ones, which have been my classical stuff, have had anything that involved singing. If it’s got drums, it’s more likely also to be Hats Off. But I think a lot of it’s just the length! 

Vasily Arkhipov: A human dilemma

Nick Holmes Music: On your recent single, One Word That Means The World (Arkhipov), you’re very much in the moment trying to address the human dilemma?

We tend to focus on a character and the dilemma they’re facing at that moment, and what they’re going through. So to me, the story of Vasily Arkhipov is fascinating, this Soviet submariner who had previously been involved in another submarine disaster where the crew had been exposed to a great deal of radiation and many of them ended up dying of cancer.  

During the Cuban missile crisis, their submarine was under water, [with] no contact with Moscow. There was a group of America warships. There were depth charges being dropped. Itโ€™s said that the Americans were intending to signal to them that they’d been found, and to come up, rather than necessarily intending to sink them. But from their perspective, they were deep under water, cut off from everything, and with explosions going on around them. ย 

And the captain of the subย thought that World War III may have started, and in that situation they’re meant to fire their nuclear torpedo. Normally it would be the First and Second in command on the submarine who would be making that decision and it had to be unanimous. The number one and two on the submarine had decided to fire, but by chance Arkhipov, who was a senior person on the whole fleet of submarines, was on that particular submarine. He also, because of his position, had a veto and he refused.ย 

Vasili Arkhipov - Image courtesy of Olga Arkhipova
Vasily Arkhipov โ€“ Image courtesy of Olga Arkhipova

They tried to argue him round, but they didnโ€™t. But the whole sense of what it might be like to be that person, that minority opinion, when the machinery that kept the air breathable was failing, so carbon dioxide was rising. It was very hot and high levels of CO2 are a really unpleasant feeling. It feels like you’re suffocating, it induces a feeling of panic. And in that situation, he was one person who kept his head and stuck to his decision.ย And it may well be because of that, that we didn’t end up so far with the Third World War.ย So it’s frightening in terms of how close it was.

I also know that my aesthetic leans towards the dark but on the other hand, I also like our songs to have an element of hope and human choice and consequence. So there’s somebody in an awful situation, but that made a hugely significant positive decision.ย 

Nick Holmes Music: Youโ€™re working on a new album. Does it have a title yet? 

At the moment it’s The Uncertainty Principle

Nick Holmes Music: Are you going to stick with that, do you think? 

I suspect we will, unless something better crops up between now and then. 

Nick Holmes Music: For a non-scientific person, what is The Uncertainty Principle?ย 

I’m not a physicist. I enjoy ‘popular science’ physics, but I’m not claiming to have a very great mathematical expertise.   

For a big chunk of human history, cause and effect was gods making things happen. We couldn’t understand or predict, ‘why has this crop failed?’ Well, there’s some supernatural explanation. Then you had the Enlightenment as we started to get more of a scientific approach to understand, โ€˜Here’s an effect, and now we’re looking at what was the cause of it. Oh well, it’s because of this weevil, that’s infested the grain, or this is what’s happened in terms of the climate.’ย 

You have the Newtonian world where if you imagine every particle in the universe, in theory, if you knew where every particle was and where it was moving, how fast, you could work your way back, if you had sufficiently good computers and maths, and work out the state of the universe at any point in the past or future. At that time, there wasn’t that great accuracy in the scientific measurements. The tools were limited, but as they improved with microscopes and telescopes, we got more precise understanding of the universe, and I think most scientists thought that as time went on, weโ€™d get more and more this dream of limitless precision.  

But with quantum physics, Heisenberg showed that the more precisely you know one thing about a particle, the less you know about another aspect of it. So then we’re talking about momentum and position, it’s not true that you could just get better and better microscopes, and so you would know more and more detail about where this particular particle is and what it’s doing. Actually, at a fundamental level there is uncertainty in the universe. Itโ€™s not that we are uncertain how we measure things, it’s not the failing of the technology. Itโ€™s actually a fundamental aspect that the universe appears to be built from randomness – there are random elements underlying reality. We then play with that in a metaphorical sense, maybe a little bit superficially!  

In my medical work, one of the major reasons for medical errors is excessive certainty, when somebody is really certain they know what is going on with somebody and actually their knowledge is wrong. Being excessively certain can be very dangerous, and that could be true in medicine, in politics, in wars. I think certainty is an underappreciated danger. You know, people are always being told โ€˜Oh, you’ve got to be really confident and certain of everything.โ€™ Actually, being able to acknowledge, โ€˜well, this is what I think but I don’t know’, I think is a really valuable skill.ย 

Nick Holmes Music: So does this feed back into the concept of the previous album The Confidence Trick (2022)? 

It does link into the idea of people being excessively confident and certain of themselves and harming other people through it. Often, unfortunately, the people who are very confident do very well on a personal level, but while harming those around them. Other people who are very confident are certain that when they send people into wars that it’s going to be easy and glorious, but it’s not them going and fighting and dying. It’s just a common theme throughout the history and science and medicine.ย 

The Cover of The Confidence Trick by Hats Off Gentlemen It's Adequate

Nick Holmes Music: Is it something that you’ve researched specifically? 

I used to do research and teach about overconfidence and excessive certainty in medicine, in diagnosis. One of the key things I used to try and teach was pause to every so often and think, โ€˜Why might I be wrong?โ€™ We tend to always look for evidence that supports our existing beliefs. It’s much more difficult because it’s so counterintuitive – we want to be told. We want to find reasons that we are right. But it’sย an important mental discipline to be thinking, particularly with high stakes decisions, โ€˜OK, well, why might I be wrong?โ€™ And I think that happens too infrequently in public life.ย 

Nick Holmes Music: And for the new album, can you say how that feeds into the songs? 

We used to believe in cause and effect, so one of the issues at a quantum scale is that cause and effect are not as obvious as they seem to be in the macroscopic world. We used to believe in certainty. So the first song explores that the historical setting of humanity coming across the idea that actually we can’t be certain, not just because we aren’t yet good enough technologically, but actually because it’s a fundamental part of reality, that certainty is impossible. ย 

We’ve got a song relating to the famous meeting between Heisenberg and his former mentor Niels Bohr in Copenhagen. I don’t know if you come across the play, Copenhagen

Nick Holmes Music: No, tell me about that. 

Heisenberg was a very significant physicist who developed many of the most significant ideas in quantum physics, and he was working on the German side in WW II, and he was leading their nuclear research programme. He used to work closely with [Danish physicist] Niels Bohr, who was in an occupied country, and they had a meeting during the War and they both recall the contents of this meeting very differently.ย 

Dr Werner Heisenberg
Prof. Dr Werner Heisenberg. image provided to Wikimedia Commons by the German Federal Archive

What they say about what they thought the other person was meaning differs greatly. Heisenberg was quite ambiguous even after the War about what his role was and what his intentions were. Some people have argued, did he deliberately slow the Germans down? He did make an error in a calculation which may have helped persuade them not to pursue a nuclear bomb very vigorously. Others argue that they were not in a good position to be doing that anyway. ย 

After the War, many of the German scientists were kept in an environment where they were bugged, and their conversations were transcribed, and they can be read now online. But again, these were bright people. Were they saying what they were saying because they knew they were being bugged, or were they talking openly?  

There’s all these multiple reflected layers of what this person is thinking about, what that person’s thinking about, what they thinkย the otherย person’s thinking… the idea of never being able to be certain what’s in another person’s mind. There’s a debate about was Heisenberg trying to get information to the Allies via his old friend, or was he trying to get his old friend to help in making a bomb for the Germans? ย 

It is very ambiguous. There isn’t a clear answer, I don’t think, at the end. We don’t know for certain. We might have a gut instinct, but we can never know for certain what’s in somebody else’s head. And that’s just, I thought, a really nice example of two people who really developed the concept of the Uncertainty Principle.  

Then we’ve got a story from the perspective of Moe Berg, an American baseball player who became an American spy who was sent to watch a lecture given by Heisenberg during the War, in Switzerland, armed with the idea that if he thought he was close to developing a nuclear bomb to assassinate him. Again, that explores that theme of how we know what somebody else’s intentions are on this limited evidence. This person being in this situation of having to make that kind of potentially momentous decision.

If it had been that Heisenberg was deliberately slowing down the Nazi bomb, then assassinating him could have been very counterproductive. On the other hand, it could have been the other way around, and it turns out that the War was coming to an end anyway, but the people at the time didn’t necessarily know that. It’s just another interesting example of the uncertainty playing out in interpersonal relationships amongst people for whom the concept of uncertainty had been a big part of their intellectual life. So that’s what appealed to me with that aspect of the story. 

Nick Holmes Music: Iโ€™d like to ask you about the instrumentals on your albums. Sometimes they are just used as an interlude to cleanse the palate before you go on to the next track. Do you see instrumentals as part of the fabric of the concept? 

Usually our albums are about 50:50 instrumental and vocal tracks, and then in our live gigs we do the vocal stuff live. The instrumental tracks usually aren’t directly narrative. We have got a couple of examples of things that are fairly old fashioned, traditional programme music in the kind of Berlioz-type way. 

We did a piece [Ark] about the history of the Ark Royal my grandad served on,ย and that one very much does follow the story. He was on the planes on the aircraft carrier. You’ve got bits of the music where it’s combat, and bits where it’s tensely waiting while you’re being hunted. In terms of classical music, I’m not saying there’s anything very original in that. I mean, that’s been a very standard thing in Classical music since the 1850s. ย 

And thereโ€™s another piece called Refuge, which is about my great grandmother on my mum’s side, escaping from multiple pogroms in different parts of Europe and then hiding, being protected by a village in the Pyrenees during WWII. That one does have very programmatic elements. Youโ€™ve got things that sound a bit like a train, and the music directly reflecting episodes in a story.  

On the other hand, most of our instrumental stuff is more non programmatic. It reflects a feel or a mood, orย might be bringing up or bringing down an energy between two different tracks, and sometimes an interlude. Sometimes you’ve had fairly intense vocal track and you want to give people a bit of a breather before the next angsty screeching!

Nick Holmes Music: What’s coming up for Hats Off Gentlemen Itโ€™s Adequate?

We’ll also be releasing Copenhagen as a single, the song about the disputed conversation between the physicists Bohr and Heisenberg in 1941.

We’ve got one or two more vocal recording sessions for the new album and a flute recording session to do, and then finishing off, mixing, mastering and the booklet. We put quite a lot of effort into all the packaging and the booklets. We try and give quite a lot of explanation of what the ideas were behind the albums.ย 

Nick Holmes Music: You have been moving away from flutes, certainly on the last album, but are you moving back into collaboration a bit more with your wife [the flute-player Kathryn Thomas]?

I love her contribution to the albums. It’s a question of what she’s happy to do, as she is busy with her own work as a classical musician. It’s also a question of what serves a particular song and album and theme. There is a particularly chunky flute part to come on the next album.

Nick Holmes Music: And what about live shows? Whatโ€™s coming up?

Our next gig is Prog For Peart in Abingdon, which raises funds for brain tumour research, on 13 July. Then we’ll be giving a joint headline show with EBB at the Camden Club on 22 July. We’re looking forward to Danfest in Leicester on 22 November.

We co-organise – with Chris Parkins/London Prog Gigs – an environmental charity fundraiser, Prog The Forest, which is in Camden on 1 December. I’m delighted that we’ll be joined by Tim Bowness and the Butterfly Mind, Theo Travis, Leoni Jane Kennedy, Mountainscape, The Mighty Handful, and Spriggan Mist.

On 29 December we’ll be playing I think our first show in Essex, with The Round Window, in Colchester.

I also do some solo shows, either with acoustic or electric guitar, or with keyboard. I’ll be playing a solo set at the Fiddler’s Elbow on 26 September. I’ll also be hosting an event -details to be announced – at the next Hard Rock Hell Prog festival in October.

Shows in 2024

Saturday 13 July: Abingdon – Prog For Peart, with IO EARTH, Comedy Of Errors, Sonic Tapestry, League of Lights, Tribe3, Forgotten Gods

Monday 22 July: The Camden Club, Camden, with EBB

Thursday 26 September: The Fiddler’s Elbow – Camden, Discover Unsigned Showcase – Malcolm Galloway solo set

Friday 18 October: Party at HRH Prog, details TBC

Friday 22 November: Leicester – Danfest, with The Hayley Griffiths Band and Candacraig

Sun 1 December: The Fiddler’s Elbow – Camden, Prog The Forest. With Tim Bowness and the Butterfly Mind, Theo Travis, Leoni Jane Kennedy, Mountainscape, The Mighty Handful, and Spriggan Mist

Sun 29 December: Three Wise Monkeys, Colchester, Essex – with The Round Window

Shows in 2025

Tuesday 18 Feb 2025: The 1865, Southampton – with The Lee Abraham Band

Interview: Malcolm Galloway of Prog Rock Band Hats Off Gentlemen It’s Adequate – Part I

Malcolm Galloway and Mark Gatland
Malcolm Galloway and Mark Gatland
Malcolm Galloway and Mark Gatland

The Band’s Name

Nick Holmes Music: The first question is about the band’s name. Do you regret it being a slightly flippant, jokey name? I’m thinking really of bands like Porcupine Tree. Steven Wilson started Porcupine Tree as a teenage joke and gave it the name. 

Well, I think there are some fair concerns about the band name. I think it has an element of self-deprecating English humour to it, hopefully, but I chose the name a long time before what the band evolved into, and there’s a danger that it can sound like a comedy band and although I hope our gigs are fun and friendly and inclusive, and the chat between the songs is quite playful, the music itself is often fairly bleak and thematically grim.  

We don’t take ourselves very seriously, but I think we take the music seriously and it’s not a kind of comedy band, which it easily could give the impression of being. So I think that’s a fair question.  

Do I regret it? I imagine people who have to put our band name on festival posters, I’m pretty sure they regret it because it’s very difficult with the number of letters. Either it doesn’t fit on the poster, or it has to be done at such a small font size and nobody can read it. 

On the other hand, there is something about the band name that does feel quite us. Also, we’ve got used to it, so it’s difficult for us to imagine being called something more sensible. 

Nick Holmes Music: So have you ever thought about changing it? 

Not really, although I can see that it could cause confusion. We did get once criticised, โ€˜You didn’t even bother to dress in a steam punk outfit.’ That’s fine. We’ve got nothing against steampunk, but we’ve never claimed that’s what we are. 

I suppose once you’ve already developed a branding, you’re taking some steps back to then lose that and change it. And some people really like the band name, although it does confuse some people. 

The quote is from what [German composer] Schumann said about [Polish composer and pianist] Chopin, 

โ€œHats off, gentlemenโ€”a genius!โ€ 

Photo of the composer Frederic Chopin
Polish composer and pianist Frรฉdรฉric Chopin.
Photograph by Louis-Auguste Bisson (1849).
Source: Wikimedia Commons

The image I had was these Edwardian gentlemen throwing their hats in the air. Not about something being amazing, but about something being average. And it was just that image that led to the band name.  

Research

Nick Holmes Music: In your previous career as a neuropathologist and a medical tutor you did a lot of research, and your name is on several research papers online. Do you enjoy the research you do for songs for your albums? 

I listen to a lot of audiobooks and quite often a song seems to just jump out from a phrase, or sometimes we’ll start with the theme and then research around the theme.  

So for example, the current album we’re working on relates to the uncertainty principle and the history of quantum physics. I did a lot of listening and reading around that aspect of history and physics. How much of that actually ends up directly in a song, I mean, I suspect it’s maybe like somebody writing a novel who might do a lot of research, which then is helpful for them having in their mind when writing something, rather than necessarily directly contributing to a lyric.  

But I do enjoy that sense of exploring and looking for situations, ideas and bits of history that might turn into songs. It’s a bit of a different process to the medical stuff because there’s much more room for subjectivity in songwriting. I quite like songs as a performer, where it’s from a character’s perspective and I want it to feel like that is genuinely what that character would be thinking or feeling. But their feeling doesn’t necessarily have to be true, they don’t have to be right. Whereas with the medical research, I’d feel a very strong sense of needing it to be accurate and objective because it has real-world consequences. If you put something into the medical literature that’s incorrect, that can affect patient care, which hopefully doesn’t happen so much with the songwriting. 

Nick Holmes Music: So your research isn’t peer reviewed, except by your band mate Mark Gatland? 

We will talk through the ideas for songs, but the research is an inspiration. If I was writing an academic article, I’d feel the need to cover all the evidence for and against and weigh it up. Whereas in the song you can take the perspective of a character and you don’t have to be so balanced.

Concepts

Nick Holmes Music: Do you always start with the concept when you’re writing a new album? Does the music come first or is it organic?  

It’s a mixture. The first one we did, Invisible (2012), the theme of that was about invisible disabilities. And that was very much influenced by my experience of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and coming to terms with a changing life because of the chronic pain associated with that.  

The cover of Invisible by Hats Off Gentlemen It's Adequate

It’s not a concept of in terms of directly telling a story, but it’s aimed at having an arc emotionally in terms of the response to that situation. I think most of the songs for that album I’d written separately, but they felt like they came together under that theme. 

Our second album When the Kill Code Fails (2016), follows a story about a virus that has been created by an employee of a security service. The virus is supposed to have had a kill-switch built into it, so that it can be controlled. The former hacker who created the virus wasn’t entirely honest with his employer, with the intention of blackmailing them. He dies during interrogation,  leaving an out of control virus threatening any infrastructure dependent on networked computers. The album opens with an official begging for help from an experimental artificial intelligence, which turns out to be quite benevolent. It agrees to help in exchange for being freed from its virtual confinement.

Apart from the opening song, the album follows the story, rather than directly trying to tell the story. I hope being aware of the story might be of interest to listeners, without being essential to enjoying the music.

The cover of Hats Off When the Kill Code Fails by Hats Off Gentlemen It's Adequate

The story helps when I’m writing in terms of giving me a sense of what shape I’m aiming towards. With the concept albums I’m very happy if people want to engage with the theme and the concept. They may get something more out of it if they do, but it’s also fine if they don’t. I think the primary beneficiary of the concept is me when I’m writing it because it helps me structure what I’m trying to do. 

Then the third one, Broken but Still Standing (2017, that very much had a sort of chronological narrative of following human evolution basically from the bottom of the ocean by the thermal geothermal vents through the boring billions of years when life was just slime before it got round to doing anything very interesting, and particularly focusing on evolution. When we think of evolution, it’s often thought of in terms of competition, which is biologically important, but sometimes the importance of cooperation as a technology is underappreciated.  

The Cover of Broken but Still Standing by Hats Off Gentlemen It's Adequate

So when we went from being slime to being multicellular organisms, that was only possible because two completely different organisms ended up becoming symbiotically dependent on each other. And then later on, when we go from being individuals to being communities and allowing subspecialisation within human communities, a similar kind of concept to what happened in the development of multicellular organisms.  

And that album carries on into a sort of posthuman future where you’ve got symbiosis between machines and the humans. And so it’s basically going on that arc, not necessarily in as depressing away as we might have expected from most of our stuff. 

Nick Holmes Music: Do you find it hard to remove your scientific hat? 

I would find it hard to put in a lyric something that I knew was scientifically untrue, or some of our historically related songs… If I was writing just text, I would have lots of footnotes and clarifications, which doesn’t really flow as a lyric. So I realise that we do have to simplify a narrative for a song. Or at least we may want or allow a certain ambiguity that you may not want in a more academic context.  

There is a tension between the artistic and the academic. I wouldn’t feel comfortable in something that portrayed itself as a historical or scientifically themed song to write anything that was actively untrue, so I hope in our research we’ve avoided that, but also while accepting that there are gross simplifications to make something fit into the structure of a song. 

Nick Holmes Music: The most recent album, The Light of Ancient Mistakes (2023) felt like a series of themes rather than an overarching concept? 

That’s one that doesn’t have a story, but it has got several interlocking themes. One is the idea of tragedies that then have repercussions through history. We might use science fiction stories as a way into those themes, although they are themes that are very relevant in real life. It gives you a little bit of a sense of distance to explore them thousands of years in the future rather than now – so that that theme of the ongoing harm from past atrocities.

We’ve also got a similar thing in terms of the childhood of the writer [David John Moore Cornwell] who became John le Carrรฉ and had a traumatic childhood, and he felt that very much influenced his ongoing relations with people around him throughout his life.  

Then also, at the end of the album, exploring environmental damage and the ongoing harms from the carbonification of our economy.  

Nick Holmes Music: Are you ever worried that the songs or the albums might just fall over under the weight of the concept? And I’m not saying that they do, but do you see it as a risk? 

[Pauses to think] I haven’t really thought about that in terms of our stuff previously, but I have had previously ideas that could have formed albums or songs where I said, โ€˜Well. I can see that giving an arc of say two or three songs, but if we try to make that into an album, I feel I’d then be padding it out and I wouldn’t want to feel I was doing that’, and so there are plenty of concepts that don’t become albums.  

For example, for quite a lot of our albums, thereโ€™s a theme rather just an individual story. I wouldn’t necessarily want it to be just a hackneyed sequence of, you know, inciting incident and then the hero is knocked back, and then the standard story flow for everything. But for us it very much depends on what the inspiring concept is, so if it’s a general thematic concept then I think we can bring in a wide range of different styles and ideas. If it’s a particular story, then thereโ€™s maybe a clearer thematic path, but you’re also a bit restricted from veering off [down] side alleyways on the way there.  

It perhaps would be harder if we were doing it like a musical, where it’s literally telling a story, but I think our albums are more, when there’s a story, it’s more they’re following a story rather than telling a story. So sometimes people have said it’s like watching a film, if they’re listening to an album from start to finish and it’s got a shape and a flow. You wouldn’t necessarily know what the story was without reading the notes because we’re not necessarily making it very explicit. 

I’d quite like the idea of doing a musical as a separate kind of thing. I do like musicals, but there the storytelling is more overt, whereas [on our albums] maybe the story is sometimes more like a landscape that you’re following, and then that helps guide the writing rather than necessarily having to say, โ€˜look, that’s a tree, that’s a mountain.โ€™ 

Nick Holmes Music: If itโ€™s ok with you, Iโ€™d like to talk to you about Ehlers-Danlos syndrome? 

That’s fine. I try to raise awareness of invisible disability issues. 

Nick Holmes Music: What effect does it have on you?  

It’s a genetic disease that causes problems with collagen. Collagen is the most extensive protein in your body and it basically holds everything together. For me personally, chronic pain, fatigue, vomiting, problems with blood pressure regulation, autonomic dysfunction… 

Nick Holmes Music: Which means that the basic nervous system isn’t working? 

Well, yes, you sometimes get not enough blood going to your brain. 

Nick Holmes: And brain fog? 

Brain fog is a really important one which I was forgetting then, which is a nice example of it!

And then it gives peripheral neuropathy. So you know, I don’t feel my where bits of my body are so accurately as might be nice. The tendency to trip up like does make doing things like looping on your pedalboard difficult – my feet really aren’t very reliably agile! 

Nick Holmes Music: The classic Pain Scale [in America] is one to 10. Do you see your pain in a visual way, rather than just being on the medical pain scale? 

I don’t normally think of it in terms of scale. And it does vary from day-to-day which bits are working better or not. And so there’s a huge difference between when I was still doing the medical work that involved sitting at a microscope, which is probably one of the worst positions for people with spinal problems. And then I was getting recurrent slipped discs, and acute slip disc is a very different pain to the kind of more general chronic muscle pain I might get, or where the muscles insert into the tendons and the bones.  

Pain Scale from 1 to 10
Pain Scale with Words from Wikimedia Commons , by MissLunaRose12

Sometimes it’s more of an acute pain. Like when you’ve got an acutely slipped disc that’s just agonisingly awful or then there’s the more chronic pain, which just grinds you down. It’s a very different kind of experience. 

Nick Holmes Music: What’s the relationship between creativity and your pain. Is music an escape from pain?  

Being able to express some of the less positive feelings in life through something constructive I find really helpful. In off stage life, I’m not necessarily very expressive of these things. I might explain in rational terms what I experience, but I don’t think I express it much in a very emotional way. Whereas when I am singing, I get to express those things in a what for me is a safe environment. Even the songs that aren’t about my bad back – I might be singing a song about being an angsty robot or something – even though the causes might be different, the sense of distress of the character might be similar, and for me being able to express those kind of feelings in a song makes me not have to deal with them so much in the off stage bits of life. 

The Cover of I'm Tired and Everything Hurts by Hats Off Gentlemen It's Adequate
The cover of the charity single Iโ€™m Tired And Everything Hurts

Nick Holmes Music: Do you find when you’re songwriting and producing songs, can you, to an extent, forget the pain? 

It certainly is very helpfully distracting. I think the music is really important for me in terms of how I manage my pain. I would be in a much worse state, particularly mentally, I think, if I didn’t have a creative outlet. 

Nick Holmes Music: Do you feel there’s a medical reason for the enjoyment you get out of music. Does it produce chemicals such as dopamine in your brain? 

For me with the kind of scientific background ultimately, I would think there’s neurochemical and biological underpinnings for this. But I do think there are a lot of people who find music hugely helpful with dealing with difficult situations, whether that’s as performers or through listening. Often at concerts we get people coming up afterwards and saying that they really appreciated such and such song, it made them feel understood. That sense of being able to actually communicate with somebody who might have difficulty explaining how they feel, that feels significant to me. 

Nick Holmes Music: On the recent single, One Word That Means The World (Arkhipov) you used AI to create the cover, is that right? 

I’ve had a long-standing interest in AI, going back to our second album, some of which is sung from the perspective of an AI that thinks it is conscious, or at least acts as if it thinks it is conscious. 

For a while, artificial intelligence in the arts became fashionable, and now there is a reaction against it. On the creative side, I do understand the arguments of people who are against AI being used in art. There are certainly issues about recompense for people whose art has been used in training models. I’m not disputing that, but from our perspective, as people who see the album artwork as an integral part of the album, we find it a useful tool. Like any tool, it can be used well or badly. We use AI assisted imagery as part of a process that generally involves combining elements from multiple images, sometimes combined with photography, and manipulation in Photoshop.

It’s not just that we put a prompt of say โ€˜Prog Rock album coverโ€™ and then just take the first one that comes up, but I don’t want to give a misleading impression that I can draw or paint, and I greatly admire those who can. I think some of the problem relates to terminology. Generating, selecting, editing, and manipulating AI generated imagery to produce something that resonates with you is perhaps more like being a curator, director, photographer, or collage artist, rather than being a painter.  

The Cover of One Word That Means the World (Arkhipov)
The cover of One Word That Means The World (Arkhipov)

I’ve never hidden the fact that some of our album covers do have AI elements, but then again, as somebody who’s been interested in AI, I’m interested in the weaknesses of some of these models, as well as their strengths. I think sometimes you can learn something interesting when an experiment fails. 

Many years ago, I was involved in a project trying to train AI to diagnose brain tumours and it was better than chance at it, but nowhere near good enough at that stage to replace a pathologist. But by going through the process of trying to teach something artificial how to do a task, it made me realise that how I thought I was doing that process wasn’t how I was actually doing it.

Often when you have a certain expertise in something, what you think are the processes you go through to make a decision may not actually reflect what you’re really doing. By trying to teach a machine by giving it certain rules and then seeing where it’s going wrong, you can learn about how you really do something. Similarly, I think sometimes it’s interesting when you give a prompt to an AI and it comes up with something that’s not quite right in that kind of uncanny valley way. I’m interested in those aspects of the failures of the system as well. 

I am concerned about the material that is used to train AI models – both language and images. In addition to the problem of fair payment for use of copyright material, I think anybody who has spent more than a few minutes on the Internet will be aware that not all attitudes expressed therein are great exemplars for how you might want to train a future intelligence!

Nick Holmes Music: Steven Wilson surprised everyone โ€“ including himself! – last year by writing a Christmas song, using lyrics that had been generated by AI. How do you feel as a musician about collaborating with artificial intelligence, either lyrically or musically? 

I’m not against it principle, but I think if I did, my interest would be in that aspect where what is generated is somewhat flawed. So if it was openly that this is in collaboration with an AI that doesn’t actually understand what the words mean, but they’ve put together, probabilistically, in terms of predicting what words likely to come next, that also may be telling you something which may or may not be interesting about that huge swathe of data on which it’s trained. 

So far it hasn’t hugely appealed to me for our actual songwriting. For me, the lyrics are really important, 50% roughly of the creativity, and often explore scientific and historical themes. The stuff we’re writing is not the kind of thing on which AI models will currently have been trained. But then again, a lot of lyrics throughout history have not been particularly original. How many variations of love songs are there without repeating a concept?  

I can imagine AI being good at making variants within the constraints of standardised, formulaic forms. For example, if you wanted to have a Concerto Grosso in the style of a prolific composer, you could probably get an AI to produce something that would sound like a decent mid-ranking composer of such things.  I’m not saying I’d necessarily want to listen to it though!

Similarly with visual art, you might be able to generate an image similar to some that already exist, but it would currently struggle to produce something original. Although you could argue that when we think we’re producing something new, it’s largely about juxtaposing existing contrasting elements. I think humans are currently better than AI at producing artistically interesting new combinations of ideas, but I don’t know if in principle that will always be the case.

Perhaps it depends on whether we think intentionality is essential for something to have artistic meaning. At the moment, there is no suggestion that AI have a sense of self with which to care about anything they produce. There is a philosophical debate to be had as to whether that matters. A landscape can be moving without having been generated with an artistic intention.

Nick Holmes Music: Do you ever see yourself using artificial intelligence in the production process? 

I have no problem with that in principle. For example, when we record the vocals I spend quite a lot of time cutting out mouth noises and plosives. If there was software that did that reliably for me without messing up the character of the rest of the sound, that would be fine by me. I wouldn’t miss that aspect of it. There are certain tools that I do use as part of that process, but I tend to have them on quite subtle settings and then work on the worst bits by hand. I’d have no problem delegating that to a reliable AI.  

Some people use AI based mastering. So far when I’ve tried it, I haven’t liked it as much as what we do by ear but then again, I might be quite biased because I’m choosing what I do when I’m doing it by ear, and maybe somebody else would prefer what the AI is doing. I don’t know. I could imagine in the future, though, it could well be better than I would do. I mean, mastering was something that I learned to do in order to release my stuff rather than because it was something that I had a natural affinity for. 

Nick Holmes Music: What have you learned about producing? Do you feel you’ve improved over the years? 

I do. So the first album we did, Invisible, I didn’t really imagine it would be listened to by anybody other than me. It was just like a ticking off a thing for myself, โ€˜I’ve made an album. Good. That’s an achievement. Iโ€™ll do something else next’, but without really thinking that it was likely to be heard by anyone. And I was just mixing that and mastering it on the laptop with ยฃ30 little Sony earbuds, which apparently is not the done thing in a pro level studio! 

I think fortunately when I listen to it on things that aren’t ยฃ30 earbuds it sounds right. I haven’t had any kind of particularly negative feedback about it, but I think that’s more by luck than because of my skill there, I think that that was a fortunate accident that worked out OK. It could have been that I put it on proper speakers and it was just this massive low end [makes low bass noise] which I would never have heard on these earbuds, because the frequency just doesn’t go low enough. And I think as our albums have gone on, technically the producing I think has got better as I’ve learned more about what I’m doing hopefully. 

Nick Holmes Music: In what sense? Is it about the equipment that you put in your home studio? 

No, not really. My home studio is me and the laptop. I’m lying down in bed because I have to spend most of my time lying down. And so I do most of my music work just with the laptop on my chest and lie down. 

Nick Holmes Music: But with a decent pair of headphones? 

I now have a decent pair of headphones. But actually the equipment is not particularly different to what I was using, but the way I listen hopefully has evolved and you know I’m more aware I think of carving out space for particular instruments and think about the EQ and certain technical things with the reverbs. But the actual facilities aren’t that different, it’s just hopefully how you use them!

Ms Amy Birks – Interview

The Cover of In Our Souls by Ms Amy Birks

Ms Amy Birks is an award-winning vocalist and songwriter, and also produces and arranges her own music. She previously sang with the acclaimed band Beatrix Players, and she released her first solo album All That I am & All That I Was in 2020. Now she returns with her new album In Our Souls. In an in-depth interview with Nick Holmes Music, she talks about how she writes and records her music and the inspiration for songs on her album, including the Brontรซ sisters and their home at the Parsonage in Haworth, West Yorkshire.

PART I Writing and Recording

I think I know who I am and what I want to do with my life and what my purpose is. So maybe that comes through.

Nick Holmes Music: To someone who doesn’t know your music, how would you describe the style?

Ms Amy Birks: I would say it was a mixture of classical meets songwriter and it has a kind of haunting and theatrical presence. And I definitely don’t get stuck in one genre. You know it’s whatever comes naturally, but definitely the theatrics, drama, songwriter, classical with a dash of rock in there.

Nick Holmes Music: There’s something quite theatrical about some of the spoken word introductions to some of the songs on the album.

Maybe it was lockdown that sent me very internal โ€ฆ It wasn’t a planned thing. I would just come up into my studio, really working and reworking the tracks and with Brothers and The Woman in White it just felt natural to add an extra layer of drama on there, so it was just me locked in a room with, โ€˜How can I really put myself into it?โ€™ I remember from my last album with Jamaica Inn when I did the video, I really enjoyed a bit of acting for the video, so I think that’s in me and the performer in me came out.

Nick Holmes Music: How would you describe your voice? It’s quite distinctive, isn’t it? Have you had any formal training?

Ms Amy Birks: Oh no, I was only speaking to John Hackett [flautist on the album and younger brother of Steve Hackett] about that the other day and he said, โ€˜of course you’ve had training havenโ€™t youโ€™ and I said, โ€˜no, not one hour, one day, nothing.โ€™ I’ve always sang since I can remember โ€ฆ  I was in the church choir, just up from the family house. As soon as I could sing in front of the school audience, I was up there and then I did Music Tech at university, so all the way through my life I’ve had opportunities to sing, but no formal training โ€“ piano, yes, but not vocals.

Nick Holmes Music: So it just came out naturally, that really rich sort of mezzo soprano?

Ms Amy Birks: Yeah, it’s maybe because of the people that I’ve listened to in the past. I would religiously listen to Eddi Reader of Fairground Attraction when I was in my younger teens, and I can hear sometimes in my pronunciation that you can tell certain artists that I’ve listened to. So it was like Eddi Reader, Alanis Morissette, and Tori Amos. Those sorts of guys. Never really Kate Bush to be honest, even though that tends to come up quite a bit, I was more into Joni Mitchell, Natalie Merchant and Suzanne Vega, very much. It’s that world and the storytelling.

Nick Holmes Music: How and when do you actually write?

Ms Amy Birks: This might sound odd, but I don’t plan it. I feel like something comes to me and I have to very quickly go up to my room or grab some paper and the song comes very quickly, or the idea. Sometimes the piano riff comes first, but I generally feel like someoneโ€™s going, โ€˜Hey, you’ve got to get this down nowโ€™, if that doesn’t sound weird. I never say, โ€˜Right, this weekend, on Saturday and Sunday, I’m going to go and sit and just wait and see what happens. It doesn’t work like that. I have to wait for it to come to me and then I disappear for a while.

Nick Holmes Music: And which comes first, the words or the music?

Ms Amy Birks: A lot of the time it’s all at the same time. So I can kind of hear a finished piece, but then have to decipher, break it down, โ€˜Okay, my lyrics are coming.โ€™ I’m writing it down and the melody and the structures are all coming at the same time, unless I’m sat at my piano, I think, โ€˜Well, actually I like this piece, I’ve got a good idea coming here.โ€™ And then I’ll write lyrics. But the main vocal melody and the lyric tends to come at the same time, and sometimes cello, piano, and bass and everything all at the same time.

Nick Holmes Music: Do you write at the piano, or does it come into your head?

Ms Amy Birks: It comes into my head and then I have to find it on the piano because I’m not a naturally gifted pianist. Not at all. I would find it very daunting playing in front of anybody.  I’m very different when it comes to my voice, I can sing in front of anybody but piano, totally opposite. I see it very much as a vehicle to get my ideas out, rather than me being a pianist. So, it comes into my head and then I have to work through and work out, โ€˜What is that, what note is that?โ€™

Nick Holmes Music: Is it fair to say that in some ways In Our Souls is a less personal album than your first album All That I am and All That I was?

Ms Amy Birks: Yes. I think so, but there are a couple of songs that are deeply personal on this, Brothers being one of them, I needed to just get that off my chest and out there. The Woman in White is definitely about me and my past marriage. But the rest, I kind of just wanted to have more fun with the music. And I suppose I’m in a better place. So, not so many horrendously charged songs. Hopefully it feels a little bit more uplifting this time.

Nick Holmes Music: You recorded, produced and mixed the album. How did you find that? Did you find it difficult to be objective and step back from it all?

Ms Amy Birks: I suppose it was actually but, Tom Manning [guitarist] listened to the mixes towards the end and also my manager Ian Blackaby. So, I had those guys to just tell me, โ€˜Is this okay or tell me to stop now!โ€™ But I felt like I was in a much better position to understand what I was doing this time compared to the last album. I spent hours and hours on really understanding sound and the soundscape and positioning. I try if I can to structure a lot of my music based on an orchestra. You know where they would sit naturally within the orchestra, which is I suppose natural for my music because it always seems to have cello or violin or viola in. And so that kind of creates my base. But I did find it easier this time. It was hard, the first album. I was really quite worried, I didn’t know whether it was going to be good enough, how people were going to react to it, but for this one I felt more confident and I’m proud of it, even before it went out the door so that was a good test for me, I think.

Nick Holmes Music: You did all the arrangements yourself? They feel quite a lot more complex than the previous album.

Ms Amy Birks: That’s probably just my brain becoming more complex, but arranging is one of my favourite things to do. I love layering and working out how to build the tracks. I spent a hell of a lot more time on arranging than I did actually writing the songs, that’s for sure. Definitely a favourite part of the whole process.

Nick Holmes Music: It feels that there’s a new kind of maturity and richness both about your singing and your song writing compared with the first album, which was excellent by the way โ€ฆ

Ms Amy Birks: Thank you!

Nick Holmes Music: What’s changed? How did that come about?

Ms Amy Birks:  I’m less stressed about everything, I think because I’ve just matured and realised what life is about a bit more. And I have a really solid partner in crime in my now husband, Simon, so I just have the headspace that I never had before. And now I think – I know this sounds a bit deep – but I think I know who I am and what I want to do with my life and what my purpose is. So maybe that comes through.

Nick Holmes Music: So does your husband contribute creatively?

Ms Amy Birks: No, he’s just got a really good way of looking at life. He’s a crazy passionate ultrarunner and he’s really wonderful to talk through ideas with. Actually he’s got a really good voice, and he introduced me to bands like Depeche Mode that I never really listened to before, so maybe that had some sort of influence โ€ฆ. there were some electronic sounds actually that came through, and that’s probably off the of the back of me listening to some of the Depeche Mode records, but no creative input. It’s just good to chat through ideas at the end of the day.

Nick Holmes Music: You did virtually all the backing vocals yourself; how important was it to you that that you had this multi layered approach to the backing vocals?

Ms Amy Birks: It’s something I do naturally. I love harmonising off the cuff. I would never write a melody down or really take that much time. I just press record and see what happens. So there’s a lot of that on my record where it’s just of the moment. I put down what comes into my head and see what happens. Thereโ€™s quite a bit of that on the album and I just enjoy it. I enjoy the build-up of layers of vocals. Maybe it comes back to my roots singing in choirs, and growing up in a house where my dad could sing. My mum can, but she would never admit it. So there’s always voices around. But for me, I kind of challenge myself, โ€˜Let’s see how obscure I can make this next vocal lineโ€™, and then see if I can interweave it; I like clashes, but it’s still got to make sense when it’s there.

Nick Holmes Music: Steven Wilson has said that he was very strongly influenced by The Beach Boys in terms of layering vocals, and he does most of his backing vocals. Was there any particular band that influenced you?

Ms Amy Birks: I think if you listen to some of Eddi Readerโ€™s records, I always loved her atmospheric sort of vocals, and it was always her. So I assume it’s probably come from that. I used to, from 13 or 14 years old, put her records on; this is how I taught myself that how to be able to harmonise with anything on the spot is to listen to records, like the stuff from Eddi Reader and just never hit her main note, and just train my brain to very quickly snap into what that chord could be. So I should imagine it’s from that.

Nick Holmes Music: And there’s a male voice that creeps in occasionally; is that your dad?

Ms Amy Birks: Thatโ€™s my dad, yes. He got up on Saturday actually and sang at the album launch which was beautiful and I cried a little bit at the end. He sang Say Something [from the first album] with me, which is really poignant because the lyrics kind of point to my dad saying that to me, โ€˜Why didn’t you say something?โ€™ So it was a real moment that we caught, but yeah I love his voice. Say Something was about two things that happened in my childhood. One, I was attacked by a boy in my music class when I was 14 and he got expelled; and the next was I used to do quite a bit of modelling and at the age of 17, I worked with a photographer, and he was horrendous to be around, and the sort of stuff that he was encouraging me to try and do was justโ€ฆ no one should be faced with that sort of behaviour at the age of 17. There was a lot of nude photography around me, and just things that happened and were said to me and done around me that I should never have experienced. But for some reason at the time, because he was kind of trying to be my manager, music wise, I didn’t say anything because I was scared of losing out on something. And I opened up to my parents later on and said, you know, he was a horrible man and the things that he said and did should never have been allowed to happen. I know it’s pretty hard and awful for my dad to hear, so then I wrote the chorus of Say Something from his perspective. So then to get up and sing together was emotional, to say the least.

Nick Holmes Music: Are you happy to talk about this?

Ms Amy Birks: I think you have to be open. If I’ve written a song about it then I’ve got to talk about it.

Nick Holmes Music: It’s in the public domain isn’t it?

Ms Amy Birks: Yes.

PART II Individual Songs on In our Souls

The less control you have I think from external sources the more creative you can be

Nick Holmes Music:  So let’s talk about individual tracks on the new album, starting with Brothers. It has really anguished opening spoken words, โ€˜Do you do you know why?โ€™ And it’s about the relationship with your estranged brothersโ€ฆ

Ms Amy Birks: My twin and my younger brother. We’ve just had a very, very difficult relationship. I think maybe with my twin it probably started โ€ฆ I was never competitive with him, but I think it was the other way around. I even think it probably started when we were children in school. We were very good at sport so teachers would put us up against each other in things like swimming races, so that competition emerged. So maybe it started there. But really very sad, really, because you think twins are going to be close, but I’ve just had the most difficult relationship; it’s the most difficult one I’ve ever had in my life, and I’ve had a few difficult ones, and it’s upsetting. And really, I can’t put my finger on what it is, which is why I say, โ€˜do you know? Do you know why?โ€™ Because I really don’t, and I don’t know why โ€ฆ There’s a lot of hatred between us and it is hate. I wouldn’t say it’s a dislike, and the same with my younger brother. We were very, very close until maybe six or seven years ago, something like that. And then relationships happen and people go off and meet partners and form their own opinion of life and how things should happen and – so yes, two very, very difficult relationships – heart breaking up to the point where a couple of years ago I thought it was going to break me โ€ฆ Probably why there was a lot coming through on my last album, I thought I was going to have a breakdown. It was that hard for me. But in the last three years I’ve realised that when things like this happen, you send them love and you send them on their way because certain people are not supposed to be in your life, whether they’re family or not. So if you can recognise that, you’re in a much better position then to enjoy your own life.

Nick Holmes Music: So do you feel to an extent that writing tracks like this and some of the more personal tracks on your previous album is almost a form of therapy for you?

Ms Amy Birks: Massively, yes! It’s cheaper too! Yes it’s a way of just almost putting something to bed, too. It’s like, โ€˜Yes, okay that’s out of my system now.โ€™ I hope even with Brothers โ€ฆ it could come across as harsh, yes, because it’s been a hard relationship. However, there’s a lot of sadness in there too, so I try with all my lyrics not to โ€ฆ you know they can be quite close to the bone, but hopefully never go over that line because a lot of my songs are actually written about people, actual people. So I have to be careful.

Nick Holmes Music: And talking of that, who is Elsa? Is that a real person?

Ms Amy Birks: No, no. So I wrote that song when I was about 19, so I’ve got a couple of songs on this album that are really quite old now, well sort of old! Itโ€™s fictitious, just a lady that was very aware of her needs. I was 19 or 20 when I wrote that. Maybe it was a little of me in there. I don’t know. But some songs are very deeply personal; others, I suppose like The Beatles did, right – they just made things up and they just turned them into songs. So no, I don’t know an Elsa โ€“ I never met an Elsa!

Nick Holmes Music: There are three songs on the album which use words by the Brontรซs; why did you choose to go for their poetry rather than their perhaps more famous novels?

Ms Amy Birks: I suppose because the natural one was Wuthering Heights being, you know, Kate Bush, sheโ€™s kind of conquered that one. So don’t go near that. Actually Jane Eyre is my favourite, but I think when I read their poetry, I just thought, well, this fits so easily into pieces of music because there’s so much structure there already. There’s so much rhythm and I just remember seeing Evening Solace, which is In Our Souls and straight away I was getting a melody to it. So it’s a natural thing that I never really thought to tackle a Jane Eyre. I don’t know, it’s a natural thing to go towards. Maybe I was being lazy! It’s much easier to say the poems than to come to try and capture such incredible stories, but who knows, I might just do that next. I almost think it could be a concept album, you know the bigger pieces.

Nick Holmes Music: Let’s just talk through the individual songs, starting with In Our Souls by Charlotte Brontรซ.

Ms Amy Birks: So with this there was a lot of the just singular lines that resonated with me, and to me it just sounded like the sunshine, something like a real spring morning. I do a lot of gardening, I’m in an allotment a lot, and I tried to capture something that sounded like a celebration of something beautiful, something full of life. So when that piano part came to me, the big piano riff, it was like, โ€˜Yes! This has to be for that track.โ€™ So that came separately, the piece of piano, but knowing that I was already looking at poems from the Brontรซs. So I think it’s more about bringing out the words and trying to bring out some of the character as well of each of the Brontรซ sisters. And so hopefully In Our Souls does sound like a kind of celebration and something that feels really fresh, uplifting and very English.

Nick Holmes Music: Then the next one is A Death Scene, which is Emily Brontรซ?

Ms Amy Birks: With what Emily’s written in terms of โ€ฆ  well, the only novel โ€ฆ but her poetry was dark. And from what I’ve read she seemed a feisty character, so I wanted that to come through, I think, in A Death Scene. I love the instrumentation on A Death Scene. Some of that track is definitely up there with my favourite parts of the album, normally when I’m not singing to be honest – I can sit back and listen to John Hackett, with the flute and Tom Manning with the guitar. I didn’t actually write that guitar part. I said to Tom, ‘Make people weak with this section.’ And then he sent that through, โ€˜Wow! That really is beautiful. You’ve hit the brief.โ€™ And so where I could I have just said to the musicians on the album, โ€˜Really listenโ€™. This is telling them what it is, what the songโ€™s about, and then they’ve had freedom to express themselves. I think Tom Manning especially really comes through strong on this album. I can hear Tom in the music, which is great.

Nick Holmes Music: And finally, there’s The Dream, with words by Anne Brontรซ?

I wanted this to sound intimate and personal, just like your dreams. Through reading about the sisters I saw that Anne preferred vocal music, so this has more of a traditional singer-songwriter feel to it than the other two Brontรซ poems on the album. But it’s not without its drama, where she awakes in the middle eight,

But then to wake and find it flown, The dream of happiness destroyed.

Anne Brontรซ

Nick Holmes Music: And for the Brontรซs you actually went to Haworth to do some research. How did those visits go what? What did you find out that inspired you?

Ms Amy Birks: To be honest, I’ve been going to Haworth since I was a young girl. My mum and dad took me there when I was probably seven or eight years old. I’ve always been drawn to it and there’s such a darkness around their house – the sound of black crows all around sends shiver down my spine. But I always love to just go and be still. I’m very much into the energies of the place and the House [the Brontรซ Parsonage Museum] and I think you can absorb so much from just being in a place where they would write and create and go through turmoil and have happy memories. So I visited there, and I did my research to try and work out what sort of music and what sort of classical music they were all like listening to, like Liszt for example. But for me it’s about feeling the energies in that house, and I think it’s full of them. I’ve been there probably six or seven times and will keep going back. And it’s amazing that you know if you’ve seen some of the clothes they wore and how tiny they were, and Charlotte was absolutely minute. Itโ€™s fascinating to see some of their miniatures. I resonate a lot with them in lots of different ways. I have a dollโ€™s house which is filled with antique miniatures and so there are lots of different reasons why I’m drawn to the Brontรซs.

Nick Holmes Music: And so striking that they lived in a small village, in a parsonage, and yet their imaginations were so vivid.

Ms Amy Birks: Yeah, absolutely wild. But then again, you go to the back of the House, and you step foot into the Moors. And it’s barren up there and you can imagine what โ€ฆ you have to dig deep and find happiness in a different way.  I don’t really watch the TV so I tend to go inwards and do a lot, and the less control you have I think from external sources the more creative you can be. So I get it – once you’re there, I think you can understand where they did get those ideas from and the fact that there were three of them bouncing ideas and encouraging I think that’s incredible.  

Nick Holmes Music: Is there a link between your musical influences and Iamthemorning, and the solo work of their vocalist Marjana Semkina?

Ms Amy Birks: I’m aware of their work, yeah. I’m not sure if I’m aware of the sort of music that they would listen to you, but I know of those guys yeah and I’ve got their albums.

Nick Holmes Music: I was more thinking in terms of the fact that they have quite a Victorian sensibility. And I wonder if that that relates to what we’ve been talking about in terms of the Brontรซs and looking back in time to that era.

Ms Amy Birks: There’s a romance there, isn’t there, looking back through history. Maybe it’s because of the simpleness of it – complicated for other reasons, and hardships. But we lose ourselves in silly things these days and I think they didn’t, so everything was said because it needed to be said. I think we’re too soft these days and we would get distracted and controlled too easily. So I think if there is a romance, I’ve always been drawn to that era. I’ve collected Victorian clothes since I was at university, where I’d go to Manchester, to Affleckโ€™s palace. The Victorian cape I have on the front cover of In Our Souls, that was something I bought when I about 18. So I always had a fascination with that era.

Nick Holmes Music: Mariana on her Twitter feed describes herself as a โ€˜dead Victorian girl.โ€™

Ms Amy Birks: Yeah, and her artwork’s beautiful and the whole vibe is wonderful.

Nick Holmes Music: The Woman in White – is there a literary connection? Or did you just take the title from the Wilkie Collins novel?

Ms Amy Birks: I think I read it around the time of actually writing Woman in White but that’s literally where the connection stops, because The Woman in White was definitely about me and my kind of split life of, โ€˜Who the hell is that woman over there. Oh, that’s me!โ€™ So it’s that, but I do remember reading The Woman in White at that same moment. Actually I found that hard work. I found that book really hard work. It just jumps around so much, but I got to the end of it!

Nick Holmes Music: So just looking now at Hold On, which is another real highlight of the albumโ€ฆ

Ms Amy Birks: Thank you.

Nick Holmes Music: โ€ฆ It shows a kind of new sophistication in writing and arranging – the way it starts with a gentle piano and a very sweet violin, and then rises to this huge epic guitar climax. Is that something you’re aiming at now, that kind of development within a song?

Ms Amy Birks: Yeah, more dynamics, so you really feel the quiet moments because again, that middle eight and the way that it drops, and you’ve got the guitar that’s really present, but it’s a quiet presence. Playing with those dynamics, is absolutely what Iโ€™ll do in the future. I want to really go for that. I wrote that song when I was sat by the lake in Coniston. And my husband was in the fells doing one of his runs, so it’s written about him. So this song is for Simon. So it was quite a personal song. He had โ€ฆ not the easiest start in life, but he’s found and channels a lot of his energy into running and he was up there in the fells when I wrote this. Again, a song that came very quickly and written on the back of a bookmark. I think I will play more and more with dynamics because I think you feel the words, you feel the presence in the song much more.

Nick Holmes Music: And why did you choose to end the album, to bookend it with an instrumental version of the title track?

Ms Amy Birks: I think it’s me growing as an artist in terms of confidence to be able to not sing on a track and believe that the music that I write is as strong as the lyric. And I love that piece of music without me on it, so I thought it would be a nice way of ending the album with the bookend.

PART III Musical Collaborations

There’s been a lot of natural input from the musicians on this album, and maybe thatโ€™s because there’s flexibility there, but I’m like, โ€˜Come on, inject your personality in thereโ€™, and they have.

Nick Holmes Music: Tell me a little bit about the collaborators you worked with on In Our Souls

Ms Amy Birks: John Hackett [flute] of course, he was on the last record. Everything I send to him, the stuff that you get back, I just think he’s a beautiful player. He’s very much melody and song first and he wants to complement and doesn’t want to get in the way. He’s very much that and I’m like, โ€˜Please get in the way sometimes, John, it’s fine.โ€™ I could listen to him all day. But it’s an absolute pleasure to work with someone like John, he’s great and I spent a bit of time with him with the gigs just lately. So finally after all the lockdown, it’s nice to get to know these people, but you kind of get a sense of who they are through working together with the music.

Tom Manning [guitar] I met when I was 19. I think Tom was just 18. We both did music tech together at Staffordshire University. We formed the Beatrix Players together with Helena Dove. I’ve always loved Tomโ€™s writing and playing, and Tom and I wrote Goodnight for Now when we were 19 or 20. So there are a couple of songs on that album that were right back from our university days.

Then there’s Kyle Welch, bass player. I think Kyle is 19 or 20. He’s so young and an absolutely beautiful energy, full of beans, and an incredible player. He’s so melodic and I love that fretless sound. He was recommended to me through another bass player that was my first ever bass player in my first band when I was about 16 or 17 and I said, โ€˜Hey, I really want a fretless bass on this record.โ€™ He’s still playing, and he said, โ€˜I’m nowhere near as good as this guy.โ€™ He’s young, keen, but my God is he good and I just think he is wonderful.

And then Andrew Booker, the drummer and percussionist. I met him when I supported Tim Bowness a couple of years ago in Camden. And I remember thinking then because I got up on stage with him, โ€˜Wow, this guy can really make me moveโ€™ and I’ve spent quite a few holidays and trips to South America, so I really love that sort of vibe and Andrew just gets it. He gets my direction and I love what he does. He’s so creative and absolutely magnetic to watch on stage, he really is. He’s a beautifully creative player.

Cellist Clare Oโ€™Connell, she’s lovely. I love to write for strings, so a lot of it is just sending scores, tweaking them and the guys record what I’ve played and written. She’s a beautifully sensitive player, very different to Caroline Lavelle [who played on the first album] who was really rock and roll in her playing. which I absolutely loved too!

And then, Frank van Essen, violin. Wow, he’s a powerhouse. So I sent ideas for Hold On. He messaged me saying, ‘ I’ve just put an idea down for Hold On, have a listen and see what you think.โ€™ I cried when I heard it because I thought, โ€˜Wow, you’ve just taken this to another levelโ€™, so there’s been a lot of natural input from the musicians on this album, and maybe thatโ€™s because there’s flexibility there, but I’m like, โ€˜Come on, inject your personality in thereโ€™, and they have. There’s a lot of collaboration on this record.

Ms Amy Birks onstage with guitarist Tom Manning

I’ve basically written all the piano parts and then sent the majority to Moray Macdonald to rerecord properly. Because, like I say, I can play the piano, but I don’t wish to say that I’m a pianist. But I do love to write piano. And Nicole Reynolds, who has quite different style actually, she played on Hold On and In our Souls. But she’s a busy lady and also for the for the live tracks now I’ve decided to move away from the piano, because I really enjoy what the guitar brings to the sound, so all of the live gigs weโ€™ll be doing are two guitars instead of piano. And so all the live stuff I’ve rewritten, rearranged, added, taken away things. So basically I had to rewrite the album again, so that’s tested me. But yes, a big group of wonderful musicians on this record here.

In Our Souls is out now.